<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Little-Known Search Engines</title>
	<atom:link href="http://arnoldit.com/wordpress/2008/01/09/little-known-search-engines/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://arnoldit.com/wordpress/2008/01/09/little-known-search-engines/</link>
	<description>by Stephen E. Arnold</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 16:05:30 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stephen E. Arnold</title>
		<link>http://arnoldit.com/wordpress/2008/01/09/little-known-search-engines/comment-page-1/#comment-2432</link>
		<dc:creator>Stephen E. Arnold</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Feb 2008 22:01:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://arnoldit.com/wordpress/2008/01/09/little-known-search-engines/#comment-2432</guid>
		<description>Thanks for writing. &quot;Little known&quot; is an ambiguous phrase. When I am in Europe, I do hear about Exorbyte, and I hear generally positive remarks. In the context of this Web log, &quot;little known&quot; is used to suggest that there are very interesting, even quite significant content processing systems that are not on the radar of pundits in the US consultancies, Wall Street analysts, and high-profile SEO conference organizers.
 
I do follow Exorbyte and I may include the system in my next &quot;Beyond Search&quot; study.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for writing. &#8220;Little known&#8221; is an ambiguous phrase. When I am in Europe, I do hear about Exorbyte, and I hear generally positive remarks. In the context of this Web log, &#8220;little known&#8221; is used to suggest that there are very interesting, even quite significant content processing systems that are not on the radar of pundits in the US consultancies, Wall Street analysts, and high-profile SEO conference organizers.</p>
<p>I do follow Exorbyte and I may include the system in my next &#8220;Beyond Search&#8221; study.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Heiner</title>
		<link>http://arnoldit.com/wordpress/2008/01/09/little-known-search-engines/comment-page-1/#comment-2408</link>
		<dc:creator>Heiner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Feb 2008 14:18:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://arnoldit.com/wordpress/2008/01/09/little-known-search-engines/#comment-2408</guid>
		<description>Hey Stephen,

i&#039;m surprised that you sort exorbyte to the &quot;litte known search engines&quot;. Is that an individual point of view? 

Exorbyte has the best search technology for structured data. Proven in benchmarks with over 85 million data sets. We are not like fast, autonomy and the rest (If there is any). They are good for looking in office documents. But when it comes to search in online directories, online shops, telephon books, site search + every kind of  structured data, they are the worst choice you can make.(Unless you are happy to invest most of your budget in consulting and hardware)

That is our market, and there is no one better, faster, more fault-tolerant, flexible and able to search in milliseconds in huge data sets than Exorbyte&#039;s technology.

If you would like to test it, give me an answer.

All the best

Heiner</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Stephen,</p>
<p>i&#8217;m surprised that you sort exorbyte to the &#8220;litte known search engines&#8221;. Is that an individual point of view? </p>
<p>Exorbyte has the best search technology for structured data. Proven in benchmarks with over 85 million data sets. We are not like fast, autonomy and the rest (If there is any). They are good for looking in office documents. But when it comes to search in online directories, online shops, telephon books, site search + every kind of  structured data, they are the worst choice you can make.(Unless you are happy to invest most of your budget in consulting and hardware)</p>
<p>That is our market, and there is no one better, faster, more fault-tolerant, flexible and able to search in milliseconds in huge data sets than Exorbyte&#8217;s technology.</p>
<p>If you would like to test it, give me an answer.</p>
<p>All the best</p>
<p>Heiner</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cbrady</title>
		<link>http://arnoldit.com/wordpress/2008/01/09/little-known-search-engines/comment-page-1/#comment-65</link>
		<dc:creator>cbrady</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Jan 2008 13:55:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://arnoldit.com/wordpress/2008/01/09/little-known-search-engines/#comment-65</guid>
		<description>www.lumifi.com is a new research and collaboration portal worth checking out.  Not only does it analyze content in a way not possible with traditional search engines, but it also lets you organize your research into virtual notebooks, which can be exported to the web or Word.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.lumifi.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.lumifi.com</a> is a new research and collaboration portal worth checking out.  Not only does it analyze content in a way not possible with traditional search engines, but it also lets you organize your research into virtual notebooks, which can be exported to the web or Word.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Yakov</title>
		<link>http://arnoldit.com/wordpress/2008/01/09/little-known-search-engines/comment-page-1/#comment-3</link>
		<dc:creator>Yakov</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Jan 2008 18:44:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://arnoldit.com/wordpress/2008/01/09/little-known-search-engines/#comment-3</guid>
		<description>Stephen, I wanted to let you know that Quintura has been recently named the Alternative Search Engine of the Year by AltSearchEngines.com: http://altsearchengines.com/2007/12/31/top-100-alternative-search-engines-of-the-year/. The editor of AltSearchEngines tracks hundreds of alternatives to Google since the beginning of 2007.

We have just re-launched a kid-friendly search engine Quintura Kids on http://kids.quintura.com  The most noticeable new feature is Embed it! where you can get code and embed Quintura Kids to a web or blog page.

Please check Quintura on http://www.quintura.com out and let us know your views.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Stephen, I wanted to let you know that Quintura has been recently named the Alternative Search Engine of the Year by AltSearchEngines.com: <a href="http://altsearchengines.com/2007/12/31/top-100-alternative-search-engines-of-the-year/" rel="nofollow">http://altsearchengines.com/2007/12/31/top-100-alternative-search-engines-of-the-year/</a>. The editor of AltSearchEngines tracks hundreds of alternatives to Google since the beginning of 2007.</p>
<p>We have just re-launched a kid-friendly search engine Quintura Kids on <a href="http://kids.quintura.com" rel="nofollow">http://kids.quintura.com</a>  The most noticeable new feature is Embed it! where you can get code and embed Quintura Kids to a web or blog page.</p>
<p>Please check Quintura on <a href="http://www.quintura.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.quintura.com</a> out and let us know your views.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

