<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Study Spam: Caveat Emptor</title>
	<atom:link href="http://arnoldit.com/wordpress/2008/01/31/study-spam-caveat-emptor/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://arnoldit.com/wordpress/2008/01/31/study-spam-caveat-emptor/</link>
	<description>by Stephen E. Arnold</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 16:05:30 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Graham Hill</title>
		<link>http://arnoldit.com/wordpress/2008/01/31/study-spam-caveat-emptor/comment-page-1/#comment-41415</link>
		<dc:creator>Graham Hill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Feb 2009 12:38:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://arnoldit.com/wordpress/2008/01/31/study-spam-caveat-emptor/#comment-41415</guid>
		<description>&quot;That could explain how serious could be this company&quot;..... Without meaning to stick up for the company again, I can really see why from a report writers, publishing perspective it was probably best you did something else.......but obviously without chips on shoulders and much happiness.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;That could explain how serious could be this company&#8221;&#8230;.. Without meaning to stick up for the company again, I can really see why from a report writers, publishing perspective it was probably best you did something else&#8230;&#8230;.but obviously without chips on shoulders and much happiness.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anom</title>
		<link>http://arnoldit.com/wordpress/2008/01/31/study-spam-caveat-emptor/comment-page-1/#comment-21275</link>
		<dc:creator>Anom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Aug 2008 00:05:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://arnoldit.com/wordpress/2008/01/31/study-spam-caveat-emptor/#comment-21275</guid>
		<description>The website started to work in August 2008 after been down for more than one year.
It didn&#039;t work for long time and every time you were calling them asking why, they were saying was a temporary problem. But it didn&#039;t work for more than one year. That could explain how serious could be this company. A part of the spamming thing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The website started to work in August 2008 after been down for more than one year.<br />
It didn&#8217;t work for long time and every time you were calling them asking why, they were saying was a temporary problem. But it didn&#8217;t work for more than one year. That could explain how serious could be this company. A part of the spamming thing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Graham Hill</title>
		<link>http://arnoldit.com/wordpress/2008/01/31/study-spam-caveat-emptor/comment-page-1/#comment-19842</link>
		<dc:creator>Graham Hill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Aug 2008 09:40:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://arnoldit.com/wordpress/2008/01/31/study-spam-caveat-emptor/#comment-19842</guid>
		<description>Hi Stephen

Just talking about the visiongain site. www.visiongain.com - it seems to work fine on my system though the previous blogger said he couldnt get on.

Yes I would agree.... am always sceptical of people who are constantly happy and successful, I find myself continuosly grumpy and alot of what i have written on your site would only confirm this!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Stephen</p>
<p>Just talking about the visiongain site. <a href="http://www.visiongain.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.visiongain.com</a> &#8211; it seems to work fine on my system though the previous blogger said he couldnt get on.</p>
<p>Yes I would agree&#8230;. am always sceptical of people who are constantly happy and successful, I find myself continuosly grumpy and alot of what i have written on your site would only confirm this!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stephen E. Arnold</title>
		<link>http://arnoldit.com/wordpress/2008/01/31/study-spam-caveat-emptor/comment-page-1/#comment-19736</link>
		<dc:creator>Stephen E. Arnold</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Aug 2008 19:28:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://arnoldit.com/wordpress/2008/01/31/study-spam-caveat-emptor/#comment-19736</guid>
		<description>Hi, Graham Hill,

To which Web site are you referring. I put in links and when I know some go 404, I add a note. Others are--well--going to go dark due to an editorial policy or a glitch.

I am neither happy nor successful. I am generally miserable and an abject failure. Anything positive is either tongue in cheek or the opposite of what the words seem to say.

Thanks for your post about &quot;the report&quot;. Utility depends upon the reader&#039;s knowledge. At university, certain courses lay the foundation for a more advanced course. A student lacking the foundation can neither understand the more advanced course nor offer an objective evaluation of the professor and her work. 

Life, of course, in today&#039;s world is not concerned with these trifles.

Stephen Arnold, August 7, 2008</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi, Graham Hill,</p>
<p>To which Web site are you referring. I put in links and when I know some go 404, I add a note. Others are&#8211;well&#8211;going to go dark due to an editorial policy or a glitch.</p>
<p>I am neither happy nor successful. I am generally miserable and an abject failure. Anything positive is either tongue in cheek or the opposite of what the words seem to say.</p>
<p>Thanks for your post about &#8220;the report&#8221;. Utility depends upon the reader&#8217;s knowledge. At university, certain courses lay the foundation for a more advanced course. A student lacking the foundation can neither understand the more advanced course nor offer an objective evaluation of the professor and her work. </p>
<p>Life, of course, in today&#8217;s world is not concerned with these trifles.</p>
<p>Stephen Arnold, August 7, 2008</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Graham Hill</title>
		<link>http://arnoldit.com/wordpress/2008/01/31/study-spam-caveat-emptor/comment-page-1/#comment-19727</link>
		<dc:creator>Graham Hill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Aug 2008 14:05:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://arnoldit.com/wordpress/2008/01/31/study-spam-caveat-emptor/#comment-19727</guid>
		<description>The website is working for me!!!! 

I spoke to the person who wrote the report we just bought (we bought another one last week and I wanted some clarification on which Q the figures were judged from) and the guy who wrote the report was in-house and available for a quick chat. Again, this report has turned out to be quite useful for us, so again, I can&#039;t really complain. They didnt seem troubled to me - unusually helpful infact. The report also came with about a dozen first hand interviews in the appendix, so looked fairly primary led to me. Anyway, I am glad to hear you are &#039;happy and successful&#039;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The website is working for me!!!! </p>
<p>I spoke to the person who wrote the report we just bought (we bought another one last week and I wanted some clarification on which Q the figures were judged from) and the guy who wrote the report was in-house and available for a quick chat. Again, this report has turned out to be quite useful for us, so again, I can&#8217;t really complain. They didnt seem troubled to me &#8211; unusually helpful infact. The report also came with about a dozen first hand interviews in the appendix, so looked fairly primary led to me. Anyway, I am glad to hear you are &#8216;happy and successful&#8217;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anon</title>
		<link>http://arnoldit.com/wordpress/2008/01/31/study-spam-caveat-emptor/comment-page-1/#comment-10403</link>
		<dc:creator>Anon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 May 2008 14:38:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://arnoldit.com/wordpress/2008/01/31/study-spam-caveat-emptor/#comment-10403</guid>
		<description>Graham,

Thanks for your comment and bringing up such a trivial error was genius. Not everyone has the time to check every word, i certainly don&#039;t.

Anyway disgruntled ex-employee I am not, a very happy and successful ex-employee i am. I very much enjoyed and appreciated my time at the company but i was commenting on something i saw for myself. Have you been to the company website recently, or even in the last year? It doesn&#039;t work and has not done so for ages.

The company does tend to outsource all its report writers these days because they struggle to keep employees because of their methods. I don&#039;t want to go too deep in to this but some reports are good but they have not always been based on good honest primary research. Their pharma reports were generally much better than their mobile/wireless telecoms ones.

There&#039;s a good reason why they went from a promising company to a seriously troubled one.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Graham,</p>
<p>Thanks for your comment and bringing up such a trivial error was genius. Not everyone has the time to check every word, i certainly don&#8217;t.</p>
<p>Anyway disgruntled ex-employee I am not, a very happy and successful ex-employee i am. I very much enjoyed and appreciated my time at the company but i was commenting on something i saw for myself. Have you been to the company website recently, or even in the last year? It doesn&#8217;t work and has not done so for ages.</p>
<p>The company does tend to outsource all its report writers these days because they struggle to keep employees because of their methods. I don&#8217;t want to go too deep in to this but some reports are good but they have not always been based on good honest primary research. Their pharma reports were generally much better than their mobile/wireless telecoms ones.</p>
<p>There&#8217;s a good reason why they went from a promising company to a seriously troubled one.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stephen E. Arnold</title>
		<link>http://arnoldit.com/wordpress/2008/01/31/study-spam-caveat-emptor/comment-page-1/#comment-9963</link>
		<dc:creator>Stephen E. Arnold</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 13:56:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://arnoldit.com/wordpress/2008/01/31/study-spam-caveat-emptor/#comment-9963</guid>
		<description>No need to apologize. My Web log is a forum for me to express my opinions, and I certainly don&#039;t expect people to agree with me. My first 10 years of &quot;real&quot; work was in Nuclear Utility Services (a nuclear consulting firm owned by Halliburton) and Booz, Allen &amp; Hamilton. Since 1990, I&#039;ve been a consultant. I&#039;m not reluctant to criticize my work (I kept my first report because it was an example of what not to do) nor am I reluctant to call attention to what I think are weaknesses in scope, approach, research, sampling, conclusions, or writing. My mentor was a fellow famous long before Steve Jobs for identifying dumb stuff and demanding better work. Now, as I approach 65, I find myself falling into Dr. William Sommers&#039; &quot;style&quot;. My goal is not to make anyone more or less dumb (everyone has what William James called &quot;a certain blindness&quot;). My goal is to express my opinion and possibly cause positive change no matter how modest. I&#039;m dismayed by the failure rate of information technology projects. I&#039;m concerned about the time and money wasted. I&#039;m concerned about the decisions that are made based on flawed, incomplete, or context-deprived information. You&#039;re entitled to criticize my opinion, and I&#039;m going to use my Web log as a place to put information that doesn&#039;t find its way into my for-fee studies and presentations. My Web log is what it is, no more, no less. &quot;Never complain, never explain&quot; sometimes is good advice.
Stephen Arnold, May 15, 2008, 10 am Eastern</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No need to apologize. My Web log is a forum for me to express my opinions, and I certainly don&#8217;t expect people to agree with me. My first 10 years of &#8220;real&#8221; work was in Nuclear Utility Services (a nuclear consulting firm owned by Halliburton) and Booz, Allen &#038; Hamilton. Since 1990, I&#8217;ve been a consultant. I&#8217;m not reluctant to criticize my work (I kept my first report because it was an example of what not to do) nor am I reluctant to call attention to what I think are weaknesses in scope, approach, research, sampling, conclusions, or writing. My mentor was a fellow famous long before Steve Jobs for identifying dumb stuff and demanding better work. Now, as I approach 65, I find myself falling into Dr. William Sommers&#8217; &#8220;style&#8221;. My goal is not to make anyone more or less dumb (everyone has what William James called &#8220;a certain blindness&#8221;). My goal is to express my opinion and possibly cause positive change no matter how modest. I&#8217;m dismayed by the failure rate of information technology projects. I&#8217;m concerned about the time and money wasted. I&#8217;m concerned about the decisions that are made based on flawed, incomplete, or context-deprived information. You&#8217;re entitled to criticize my opinion, and I&#8217;m going to use my Web log as a place to put information that doesn&#8217;t find its way into my for-fee studies and presentations. My Web log is what it is, no more, no less. &#8220;Never complain, never explain&#8221; sometimes is good advice.<br />
Stephen Arnold, May 15, 2008, 10 am Eastern</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Graham Hill</title>
		<link>http://arnoldit.com/wordpress/2008/01/31/study-spam-caveat-emptor/comment-page-1/#comment-9917</link>
		<dc:creator>Graham Hill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 11:25:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://arnoldit.com/wordpress/2008/01/31/study-spam-caveat-emptor/#comment-9917</guid>
		<description>I know it was a cheap shot, but whoever Anon is, its obviously some ex-employee with a chip, or probably a few chips. We have bought a number of visiongain reports (though I dont think we have bought the Google one as yet) and have found them good - certainly as good as anything else out there. So I just wasnt hugely pleased at us (and companies like us) being made to appear stupid for making purchases that we have found to be beneficial, that was all.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I know it was a cheap shot, but whoever Anon is, its obviously some ex-employee with a chip, or probably a few chips. We have bought a number of visiongain reports (though I dont think we have bought the Google one as yet) and have found them good &#8211; certainly as good as anything else out there. So I just wasnt hugely pleased at us (and companies like us) being made to appear stupid for making purchases that we have found to be beneficial, that was all.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stephen E. Arnold</title>
		<link>http://arnoldit.com/wordpress/2008/01/31/study-spam-caveat-emptor/comment-page-1/#comment-9904</link>
		<dc:creator>Stephen E. Arnold</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 May 2008 19:15:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://arnoldit.com/wordpress/2008/01/31/study-spam-caveat-emptor/#comment-9904</guid>
		<description>Thanks for catching the typographical error. I appreciate it.
Stephen Arnold, May 15, 2008</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for catching the typographical error. I appreciate it.<br />
Stephen Arnold, May 15, 2008</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Graham Hill</title>
		<link>http://arnoldit.com/wordpress/2008/01/31/study-spam-caveat-emptor/comment-page-1/#comment-9895</link>
		<dc:creator>Graham Hill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 May 2008 11:11:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://arnoldit.com/wordpress/2008/01/31/study-spam-caveat-emptor/#comment-9895</guid>
		<description>The fact that you dont know the difference between &quot;they&#039;re&quot; and &quot;their&quot; may have been one of the reasons they got rid of you. I hope you have found a new job.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The fact that you dont know the difference between &#8220;they&#8217;re&#8221; and &#8220;their&#8221; may have been one of the reasons they got rid of you. I hope you have found a new job.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

