<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Poking around Google Scholar Service</title>
	<atom:link href="http://arnoldit.com/wordpress/2008/05/03/poking-around-google-scholar-service/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://arnoldit.com/wordpress/2008/05/03/poking-around-google-scholar-service/</link>
	<description>by Stephen E. Arnold</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 22 May 2012 06:55:55 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: College Chemistry Help</title>
		<link>http://arnoldit.com/wordpress/2008/05/03/poking-around-google-scholar-service/comment-page-1/#comment-9803</link>
		<dc:creator>College Chemistry Help</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 May 2008 16:44:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://arnoldit.com/wordpress/?p=358#comment-9803</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;College Chemistry Help...&lt;/strong&gt;

If a beaker contains water and a solute that dissolves endothermically in water, would the beaker feel hot or cold?...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>College Chemistry Help&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>If a beaker contains water and a solute that dissolves endothermically in water, would the beaker feel hot or cold?&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Constance Ard</title>
		<link>http://arnoldit.com/wordpress/2008/05/03/poking-around-google-scholar-service/comment-page-1/#comment-9117</link>
		<dc:creator>Constance Ard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 May 2008 18:15:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://arnoldit.com/wordpress/?p=358#comment-9117</guid>
		<description>This post brings up yet another interesting realm of information literacy for librarians.  Google Scholar may be the bridge that is necessary between Google and good information.

I have had positive research experiences with Google Scholar but it has never been my first stop.  As it continues to add content it may begin to be a top 5 stop instead of a last resort shop.

University librarians may benefit from incorporating this into the information literacy curricula.  Luckily, I don&#039;t have to make those kinds of calls.  I just have to find the answer.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This post brings up yet another interesting realm of information literacy for librarians.  Google Scholar may be the bridge that is necessary between Google and good information.</p>
<p>I have had positive research experiences with Google Scholar but it has never been my first stop.  As it continues to add content it may begin to be a top 5 stop instead of a last resort shop.</p>
<p>University librarians may benefit from incorporating this into the information literacy curricula.  Luckily, I don&#8217;t have to make those kinds of calls.  I just have to find the answer.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stephen E. Arnold</title>
		<link>http://arnoldit.com/wordpress/2008/05/03/poking-around-google-scholar-service/comment-page-1/#comment-8925</link>
		<dc:creator>Stephen E. Arnold</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 May 2008 19:38:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://arnoldit.com/wordpress/?p=358#comment-8925</guid>
		<description>My thought is about Google Scholar functionality. The various ways to move from hit to author to related topics is useful. I don&#039;t recall seeing this in the default Google Search Appliance. Thanks for the posts!
Stephen Arnold, May 4, 2008</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My thought is about Google Scholar functionality. The various ways to move from hit to author to related topics is useful. I don&#8217;t recall seeing this in the default Google Search Appliance. Thanks for the posts!<br />
Stephen Arnold, May 4, 2008</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daniel Tunkelang</title>
		<link>http://arnoldit.com/wordpress/2008/05/03/poking-around-google-scholar-service/comment-page-1/#comment-8896</link>
		<dc:creator>Daniel Tunkelang</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 May 2008 16:28:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://arnoldit.com/wordpress/?p=358#comment-8896</guid>
		<description>Google Scholar is very nice when you know the title or, in some cases, the author of the article you are looking for. It also allows you to surf the citation graph using a specified article as your entry point. As such, it is a solid incremental improvement on the CiteSeer system developed in 1997.

But, as a daily user of digital libraries, I find that Google Scholar does not help me with the highest-value use cases--namely, those where recall matters more than precision. Non-academic motives include prior art search for patents, supporting cases for freedom to operate, and competitive intelligence. Very similar to the concerns associated with discovery and compliance.

These and other applications call for a system that supports exploratory search. For example, take a look at the Faceted DBLP, e.g. http://dblp.l3s.de/?q=kolmogorov+&amp;search_opt=all&amp;synt_query_exp=none&amp;resTableName=query_resultkeHoee&amp;year_range=2003-2007&amp;author_url=&amp;resultsPerPage=100

From these results, even a non-expert might surmise that Kolmogorov is most known for Kolmogorov complexity, and that his work is relevant to clustering, machine learning, and data mining.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Google Scholar is very nice when you know the title or, in some cases, the author of the article you are looking for. It also allows you to surf the citation graph using a specified article as your entry point. As such, it is a solid incremental improvement on the CiteSeer system developed in 1997.</p>
<p>But, as a daily user of digital libraries, I find that Google Scholar does not help me with the highest-value use cases&#8211;namely, those where recall matters more than precision. Non-academic motives include prior art search for patents, supporting cases for freedom to operate, and competitive intelligence. Very similar to the concerns associated with discovery and compliance.</p>
<p>These and other applications call for a system that supports exploratory search. For example, take a look at the Faceted DBLP, e.g. <a href="http://dblp.l3s.de/?q=kolmogorov+&#038;search_opt=all&#038;synt_query_exp=none&#038;resTableName=query_resultkeHoee&#038;year_range=2003-2007&#038;author_url=&#038;resultsPerPage=100" rel="nofollow">http://dblp.l3s.de/?q=kolmogorov+&#038;search_opt=all&#038;synt_query_exp=none&#038;resTableName=query_resultkeHoee&#038;year_range=2003-2007&#038;author_url=&#038;resultsPerPage=100</a></p>
<p>From these results, even a non-expert might surmise that Kolmogorov is most known for Kolmogorov complexity, and that his work is relevant to clustering, machine learning, and data mining.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sperky undernet</title>
		<link>http://arnoldit.com/wordpress/2008/05/03/poking-around-google-scholar-service/comment-page-1/#comment-8878</link>
		<dc:creator>sperky undernet</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 May 2008 13:35:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://arnoldit.com/wordpress/?p=358#comment-8878</guid>
		<description>I have used Scholar in ways that run circles around a certain commercial citation index including the social science one. The elance ten dollar an hour researchers do not use this, confusing it with wikipedia. BTW,  my results ended up in a Fortune 500 company. Scholar can definately be of enterprise content value but then so might certain comic books and novels.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have used Scholar in ways that run circles around a certain commercial citation index including the social science one. The elance ten dollar an hour researchers do not use this, confusing it with wikipedia. BTW,  my results ended up in a Fortune 500 company. Scholar can definately be of enterprise content value but then so might certain comic books and novels.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

