<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Government High-Tech Investments: IN-Q-TEL</title>
	<atom:link href="http://arnoldit.com/wordpress/2008/05/26/government-high-tech-investments-in-q-tel/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://arnoldit.com/wordpress/2008/05/26/government-high-tech-investments-in-q-tel/</link>
	<description>by Stephen E. Arnold</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 23 May 2012 12:32:16 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: IN-Q-TEL Investments: 2006 to April 2008 : Beyond Search</title>
		<link>http://arnoldit.com/wordpress/2008/05/26/government-high-tech-investments-in-q-tel/comment-page-1/#comment-12220</link>
		<dc:creator>IN-Q-TEL Investments: 2006 to April 2008 : Beyond Search</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Jun 2008 15:38:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://arnoldit.com/wordpress/?p=483#comment-12220</guid>
		<description>[...] of IN-Q-TEL investments through April 2008. You can access the investments from 2000 to 2003 here. The investments from 2004 and 2005 are [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] of IN-Q-TEL investments through April 2008. You can access the investments from 2000 to 2003 here. The investments from 2004 and 2005 are [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: IN-Q-TEL Investments: 2004-2005 : Beyond Search</title>
		<link>http://arnoldit.com/wordpress/2008/05/26/government-high-tech-investments-in-q-tel/comment-page-1/#comment-12100</link>
		<dc:creator>IN-Q-TEL Investments: 2004-2005 : Beyond Search</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 May 2008 12:47:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://arnoldit.com/wordpress/?p=483#comment-12100</guid>
		<description>[...] and links of IN-Q-TEL&#8217;s investments up to 2002. If you want to review this information, click here. In this essay, I want to provide the list of companies receiving funding in the two year period [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] and links of IN-Q-TEL&#8217;s investments up to 2002. If you want to review this information, click here. In this essay, I want to provide the list of companies receiving funding in the two year period [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stephen E. Arnold</title>
		<link>http://arnoldit.com/wordpress/2008/05/26/government-high-tech-investments-in-q-tel/comment-page-1/#comment-11544</link>
		<dc:creator>Stephen E. Arnold</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 May 2008 02:47:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://arnoldit.com/wordpress/?p=483#comment-11544</guid>
		<description>Sperky, thanks for your comments. We used open sources for our list. Watch for the next installment this week. Your questions are good ones, and I look forward to other readers providing additional details and links to any IN-Q-TEL &quot;babies&quot; that I missed.
Stephen Arnold, May 26, 2008</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sperky, thanks for your comments. We used open sources for our list. Watch for the next installment this week. Your questions are good ones, and I look forward to other readers providing additional details and links to any IN-Q-TEL &#8220;babies&#8221; that I missed.<br />
Stephen Arnold, May 26, 2008</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sperky undernet</title>
		<link>http://arnoldit.com/wordpress/2008/05/26/government-high-tech-investments-in-q-tel/comment-page-1/#comment-11441</link>
		<dc:creator>sperky undernet</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 May 2008 15:12:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://arnoldit.com/wordpress/?p=483#comment-11441</guid>
		<description>Using prnewswire.com archive over the 2000-2003 period, the following additional names come up:

* Polexis Inc. Nov. 2000. Recently awarded a contract by the Open GIS Consortium (OGC) in the field of Geo-Hyperlinks. The OGC solicited technology proposals for the OGC Geospatial Fusion Services (GFS) Testbed. OGC, in collaboration with In-Q-Tel, are working together to jointly sponsor GFS projects.

* IntelliSeek . Initial investment was in 2001. Related to Enterprise Search Server (ESS) platform&#039;s  foreign language capabilities and upgraded analysis and categorization. June 2003 partnership between IntelliSeek and Unisys Corp. - Global Public Sector to provide government agencies the ability to &quot;search, aggregate, categorize, monitor and track content from thousands of disparate sources to deliver real- time actionable intelligence.&quot;

An innocent question is how could these be publicized on PR Newswire - nominally it has to be assumed with permission - and not be included within the list in your article? Is the reason oversight or retrospective censorship regarding work in what either became more delicate over time or what became white elephants.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Using prnewswire.com archive over the 2000-2003 period, the following additional names come up:</p>
<p>* Polexis Inc. Nov. 2000. Recently awarded a contract by the Open GIS Consortium (OGC) in the field of Geo-Hyperlinks. The OGC solicited technology proposals for the OGC Geospatial Fusion Services (GFS) Testbed. OGC, in collaboration with In-Q-Tel, are working together to jointly sponsor GFS projects.</p>
<p>* IntelliSeek . Initial investment was in 2001. Related to Enterprise Search Server (ESS) platform&#8217;s  foreign language capabilities and upgraded analysis and categorization. June 2003 partnership between IntelliSeek and Unisys Corp. &#8211; Global Public Sector to provide government agencies the ability to &#8220;search, aggregate, categorize, monitor and track content from thousands of disparate sources to deliver real- time actionable intelligence.&#8221;</p>
<p>An innocent question is how could these be publicized on PR Newswire &#8211; nominally it has to be assumed with permission &#8211; and not be included within the list in your article? Is the reason oversight or retrospective censorship regarding work in what either became more delicate over time or what became white elephants.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

