<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: SAS: BI Giant Sends Mixed Signals</title>
	<atom:link href="http://arnoldit.com/wordpress/2008/05/26/sas-bi-giant-sends-mixed-signals/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://arnoldit.com/wordpress/2008/05/26/sas-bi-giant-sends-mixed-signals/</link>
	<description>by Stephen E. Arnold</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 09:55:49 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stephen E. Arnold</title>
		<link>http://arnoldit.com/wordpress/2008/05/26/sas-bi-giant-sends-mixed-signals/comment-page-1/#comment-12076</link>
		<dc:creator>Stephen E. Arnold</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 May 2008 05:57:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://arnoldit.com/wordpress/?p=493#comment-12076</guid>
		<description>The squawking goose thanks you for the correction. RSS feeds can baffle a 64-year-old geezer. I&#039;ll keep my eye on SAS and try to figure out the difference between 2008 and 2006. .
Stephen Arnold, May 31, 2008</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The squawking goose thanks you for the correction. RSS feeds can baffle a 64-year-old geezer. I&#8217;ll keep my eye on SAS and try to figure out the difference between 2008 and 2006. .<br />
Stephen Arnold, May 31, 2008</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve Polilli</title>
		<link>http://arnoldit.com/wordpress/2008/05/26/sas-bi-giant-sends-mixed-signals/comment-page-1/#comment-12002</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve Polilli</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 May 2008 20:51:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://arnoldit.com/wordpress/?p=493#comment-12002</guid>
		<description>A note of clarification: the basis for the blog posting is a two-year old article in the SAS hometown paper, the Raleigh News &amp; Observer. That article discusses rumors of layoffs that never happened. In a May 24, 2008 article, the same paper reports on a reorganization in the SAS education practice that affected 14 positions. The current news can be seen at www.newsobserver.com/business/story/1083772.html  

To be clear, I work in SAS marketing, but I want to be sure the facts are straight. SAS passed the $2 billion mark and the changes in our education practice are unfortunate for the folks involved, but aren&#039;t a sign of trouble at SAS.  We&#039;re shooting for $3 billion annual sales by 2010.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A note of clarification: the basis for the blog posting is a two-year old article in the SAS hometown paper, the Raleigh News &amp; Observer. That article discusses rumors of layoffs that never happened. In a May 24, 2008 article, the same paper reports on a reorganization in the SAS education practice that affected 14 positions. The current news can be seen at <a href="http://www.newsobserver.com/business/story/1083772.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.newsobserver.com/business/story/1083772.html</a>  </p>
<p>To be clear, I work in SAS marketing, but I want to be sure the facts are straight. SAS passed the $2 billion mark and the changes in our education practice are unfortunate for the folks involved, but aren&#8217;t a sign of trouble at SAS.  We&#8217;re shooting for $3 billion annual sales by 2010.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

