<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Microsoft.com in 2006</title>
	<atom:link href="http://arnoldit.com/wordpress/2008/07/13/microsoftcom-in-2006/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://arnoldit.com/wordpress/2008/07/13/microsoftcom-in-2006/</link>
	<description>by Stephen E. Arnold</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 16:05:30 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Plumbing Master, Plumbing Apprentice : Beyond Search</title>
		<link>http://arnoldit.com/wordpress/2008/07/13/microsoftcom-in-2006/comment-page-1/#comment-57892</link>
		<dc:creator>Plumbing Master, Plumbing Apprentice : Beyond Search</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Jun 2009 19:23:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://arnoldit.com/wordpress/?p=894#comment-57892</guid>
		<description>[...] The Google plumbing is more homogeneous than Microsoft’s. You can see what I mean by looking at the diagram in my write up here. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] The Google plumbing is more homogeneous than Microsoft’s. You can see what I mean by looking at the diagram in my write up here. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Amazon: Server to Server Chattiness : Beyond Search</title>
		<link>http://arnoldit.com/wordpress/2008/07/13/microsoftcom-in-2006/comment-page-1/#comment-18092</link>
		<dc:creator>Amazon: Server to Server Chattiness : Beyond Search</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Jul 2008 12:35:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://arnoldit.com/wordpress/?p=894#comment-18092</guid>
		<description>[...] in my write up, Microsoft &#8220;threw hardware at the problem&#8221;. You can read this essay here.  Redmond then implemented a variety of exotic and expensive mechanisms to keep servers in sync, [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] in my write up, Microsoft &#8220;threw hardware at the problem&#8221;. You can read this essay here.  Redmond then implemented a variety of exotic and expensive mechanisms to keep servers in sync, [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

