<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Microsoft Outlook and the Enterprise</title>
	<atom:link href="http://arnoldit.com/wordpress/2008/08/01/microsoft-outlook-and-the-enterprise/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://arnoldit.com/wordpress/2008/08/01/microsoft-outlook-and-the-enterprise/</link>
	<description>by Stephen E. Arnold</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 21 Mar 2010 00:07:32 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Stephen E. Arnold</title>
		<link>http://arnoldit.com/wordpress/2008/08/01/microsoft-outlook-and-the-enterprise/comment-page-1/#comment-19058</link>
		<dc:creator>Stephen E. Arnold</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Aug 2008 02:49:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://arnoldit.com/wordpress/?p=1212#comment-19058</guid>
		<description>Hello, Klimzk,

If you check out the &quot;About&quot; entry, you will see that I am recycling &quot;old&quot; information. In my posts, I tap the research I did from 2002 to 2007. Once in a while, I will reference a current Google topic; for example, I mentioned a 2008 patent this week. The &quot;new&quot; information appears in my for fee reports. One will be coming out from IDC in a a month or so. I have a new for fee analysis of Google&#039;s data management technology  coming out in September from Infonortics Ltd. Martin White and I have a new report coming out in October. After that, I am not sure what will grab my attention.

My suggestion is to skip any headline that seems to be &quot;old&quot;. I am trying to post information so I don&#039;t lose it. I am using the Web log format because it is a new medium I am exploring. It&#039;s okay to identify the patterns in my writing, but the Web log is a diary with links and comments to remind me of points. It&#039;s okay if others read this but I am not pushing anyone to waste his or her time with this stuff.

Net net is that for my new stuff, you will have to buy the reports I do to generate revenue. The Web log is what it is and probably won&#039;t change too much as long as it holds my interest.

Stephen Arnold, August 1, 2008, 10 50 pm Eastern</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello, Klimzk,</p>
<p>If you check out the &#8220;About&#8221; entry, you will see that I am recycling &#8220;old&#8221; information. In my posts, I tap the research I did from 2002 to 2007. Once in a while, I will reference a current Google topic; for example, I mentioned a 2008 patent this week. The &#8220;new&#8221; information appears in my for fee reports. One will be coming out from IDC in a a month or so. I have a new for fee analysis of Google&#8217;s data management technology  coming out in September from Infonortics Ltd. Martin White and I have a new report coming out in October. After that, I am not sure what will grab my attention.</p>
<p>My suggestion is to skip any headline that seems to be &#8220;old&#8221;. I am trying to post information so I don&#8217;t lose it. I am using the Web log format because it is a new medium I am exploring. It&#8217;s okay to identify the patterns in my writing, but the Web log is a diary with links and comments to remind me of points. It&#8217;s okay if others read this but I am not pushing anyone to waste his or her time with this stuff.</p>
<p>Net net is that for my new stuff, you will have to buy the reports I do to generate revenue. The Web log is what it is and probably won&#8217;t change too much as long as it holds my interest.</p>
<p>Stephen Arnold, August 1, 2008, 10 50 pm Eastern</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: klimzk</title>
		<link>http://arnoldit.com/wordpress/2008/08/01/microsoft-outlook-and-the-enterprise/comment-page-1/#comment-18996</link>
		<dc:creator>klimzk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Aug 2008 19:37:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://arnoldit.com/wordpress/?p=1212#comment-18996</guid>
		<description>It seems to me month after month you just post the same thing, how Google has lower cost infrastructure, in different ways / tones / articles. It&#039;s a good read the first time around, but after a while, is there anything new you could add to it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It seems to me month after month you just post the same thing, how Google has lower cost infrastructure, in different ways / tones / articles. It&#8217;s a good read the first time around, but after a while, is there anything new you could add to it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Frank Brown</title>
		<link>http://arnoldit.com/wordpress/2008/08/01/microsoft-outlook-and-the-enterprise/comment-page-1/#comment-18973</link>
		<dc:creator>Frank Brown</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Aug 2008 14:45:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://arnoldit.com/wordpress/?p=1212#comment-18973</guid>
		<description>Looks like Microsoft is working hard behind the scenes to eliminate that Google performance advantage http://blogs.zdnet.com/microsoft/?p=1514</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Looks like Microsoft is working hard behind the scenes to eliminate that Google performance advantage <a href="http://blogs.zdnet.com/microsoft/?p=1514" rel="nofollow">http://blogs.zdnet.com/microsoft/?p=1514</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
