<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Search Fundamentals: Cost</title>
	<atom:link href="http://arnoldit.com/wordpress/2008/08/10/search-fundamentals-cost/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://arnoldit.com/wordpress/2008/08/10/search-fundamentals-cost/</link>
	<description>by Stephen E. Arnold</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 21 Mar 2010 18:57:31 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Breakfast Links</title>
		<link>http://arnoldit.com/wordpress/2008/08/10/search-fundamentals-cost/comment-page-1/#comment-20193</link>
		<dc:creator>Breakfast Links</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Aug 2008 08:33:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://arnoldit.com/wordpress/?p=1323#comment-20193</guid>
		<description>[...] Search Fundamentals: Cost http://arnoldit.com/wordpress/2008/08/10/search-fundamentals-cost/ [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Search Fundamentals: Cost <a href="http://arnoldit.com/wordpress/2008/08/10/search-fundamentals-cost/" rel="nofollow">http://arnoldit.com/wordpress/2008/08/10/search-fundamentals-cost/</a> [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Data Centers: Part of the Cost Puzzle : Beyond Search</title>
		<link>http://arnoldit.com/wordpress/2008/08/10/search-fundamentals-cost/comment-page-1/#comment-20103</link>
		<dc:creator>Data Centers: Part of the Cost Puzzle : Beyond Search</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Aug 2008 12:22:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://arnoldit.com/wordpress/?p=1323#comment-20103</guid>
		<description>[...] The &#8220;commentary&#8221; includes a table with data that backs up his analysis. The data are useful but as you will learn at the foot of this essay, offer only a partial glimpse of a more significant cost issue. You may want to read my modest essay about cost here. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] The &#8220;commentary&#8221; includes a table with data that backs up his analysis. The data are useful but as you will learn at the foot of this essay, offer only a partial glimpse of a more significant cost issue. You may want to read my modest essay about cost here. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stephen E. Arnold</title>
		<link>http://arnoldit.com/wordpress/2008/08/10/search-fundamentals-cost/comment-page-1/#comment-20035</link>
		<dc:creator>Stephen E. Arnold</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Aug 2008 01:37:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://arnoldit.com/wordpress/?p=1323#comment-20035</guid>
		<description>Yaser Bishr,

Thanks for taking the time to comment. I agree but wish to suggest that the we are not dealing with &quot;two sides&quot;; the dimensionality is more complex.

Stephen Arnold, August 10, 2008</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yaser Bishr,</p>
<p>Thanks for taking the time to comment. I agree but wish to suggest that the we are not dealing with &#8220;two sides&#8221;; the dimensionality is more complex.</p>
<p>Stephen Arnold, August 10, 2008</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Yaser Bishr</title>
		<link>http://arnoldit.com/wordpress/2008/08/10/search-fundamentals-cost/comment-page-1/#comment-20023</link>
		<dc:creator>Yaser Bishr</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 Aug 2008 21:42:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://arnoldit.com/wordpress/?p=1323#comment-20023</guid>
		<description>Nice post Stephen

I suggest another assumption: BI and search are different. 

BI and Enterprise search are becoming two sides of the same coin. I predict that search will become as common as email in the Enterprise once there is some understanding of the business value this convergence brings. See SAP acquisition of Business Objects who earlier acquired Inxight. Executives now understand that more knowledge sharing across the enterprise will lead to better operational performance. Developing a corporate strategy that encompasses both is not an option anymore. Doing so will help drive performance management and make BI information more accessible closer to the base of the organizational pyramid.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice post Stephen</p>
<p>I suggest another assumption: BI and search are different. </p>
<p>BI and Enterprise search are becoming two sides of the same coin. I predict that search will become as common as email in the Enterprise once there is some understanding of the business value this convergence brings. See SAP acquisition of Business Objects who earlier acquired Inxight. Executives now understand that more knowledge sharing across the enterprise will lead to better operational performance. Developing a corporate strategy that encompasses both is not an option anymore. Doing so will help drive performance management and make BI information more accessible closer to the base of the organizational pyramid.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Search Fundamentals: Cost &#124; Easycoded</title>
		<link>http://arnoldit.com/wordpress/2008/08/10/search-fundamentals-cost/comment-page-1/#comment-20004</link>
		<dc:creator>Search Fundamentals: Cost &#124; Easycoded</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 Aug 2008 16:28:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://arnoldit.com/wordpress/?p=1323#comment-20004</guid>
		<description>[...] 10, 2008     ScottGu Set aside the fancy buzz words like taxonomies, natural language processing, and automatic [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] 10, 2008     ScottGu Set aside the fancy buzz words like taxonomies, natural language processing, and automatic [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
