<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: More Search without Search</title>
	<atom:link href="http://arnoldit.com/wordpress/2008/08/13/more-search-without-search/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://arnoldit.com/wordpress/2008/08/13/more-search-without-search/</link>
	<description>by Stephen E. Arnold</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 16:05:30 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Future of Search? It&#8217;s Here and Disappointing : Beyond Search</title>
		<link>http://arnoldit.com/wordpress/2008/08/13/more-search-without-search/comment-page-1/#comment-20272</link>
		<dc:creator>The Future of Search? It&#8217;s Here and Disappointing : Beyond Search</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Aug 2008 13:45:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://arnoldit.com/wordpress/?p=1359#comment-20272</guid>
		<description>[...] AltSearchEngines.com&#8211;an excellent Web log and information retrieval news source&#8211;tapped the addled goose (me, Stephen E. Arnold) for some thoughts about the future of search. I&#8217;m no wizard, being an a befuddled flow, but I did offer several hundred words on the subject. I even contributed one of my semi-famous &#8220;layers&#8221; diagrams. These are important because each layer represents a slathering of computational crunching. The result is an incremental boost to the the underlying search system&#8217;s precision, recall, interface outputs, and overall utility of the system. The downside is that as the layers pile up so does complexity and its girl friend costs. You can read the full essay and look at the diagram here. A happy quack to the AltSearchEngines.com team for [a] asking me to contribute an essay and [b] having the moxie to publish the goose feathers I generate. The message in my essay is no laughing matter. The future of search is here and in many ways, it is deeply disappointing and increasingly troubling to me. For an example, click here. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] AltSearchEngines.com&#8211;an excellent Web log and information retrieval news source&#8211;tapped the addled goose (me, Stephen E. Arnold) for some thoughts about the future of search. I&#8217;m no wizard, being an a befuddled flow, but I did offer several hundred words on the subject. I even contributed one of my semi-famous &#8220;layers&#8221; diagrams. These are important because each layer represents a slathering of computational crunching. The result is an incremental boost to the the underlying search system&#8217;s precision, recall, interface outputs, and overall utility of the system. The downside is that as the layers pile up so does complexity and its girl friend costs. You can read the full essay and look at the diagram here. A happy quack to the AltSearchEngines.com team for [a] asking me to contribute an essay and [b] having the moxie to publish the goose feathers I generate. The message in my essay is no laughing matter. The future of search is here and in many ways, it is deeply disappointing and increasingly troubling to me. For an example, click here. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: More Search without Search &#124; Easycoded</title>
		<link>http://arnoldit.com/wordpress/2008/08/13/more-search-without-search/comment-page-1/#comment-20253</link>
		<dc:creator>More Search without Search &#124; Easycoded</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Aug 2008 05:15:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://arnoldit.com/wordpress/?p=1359#comment-20253</guid>
		<description>[...] ScottGu Google wizard Stephen R. Lawrence and sub-wizard Omar Khan invented a what I probably too simplistically characterize as meta-data vacuum cleaner. Useful for mobile devices, this addition to Google&#8217;s &#8220;search without search&#8221; arsenal is quite interesting to me. The invention is disclosed in US7,412,708, granted on August 12, 2008, with &#8230; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] ScottGu Google wizard Stephen R. Lawrence and sub-wizard Omar Khan invented a what I probably too simplistically characterize as meta-data vacuum cleaner. Useful for mobile devices, this addition to Google&#8217;s &#8220;search without search&#8221; arsenal is quite interesting to me. The invention is disclosed in US7,412,708, granted on August 12, 2008, with &#8230; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

