<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Future of Business Intelligence</title>
	<atom:link href="http://arnoldit.com/wordpress/2008/09/15/future-of-business-intelligence/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://arnoldit.com/wordpress/2008/09/15/future-of-business-intelligence/</link>
	<description>by Stephen E. Arnold</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 08:48:26 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: BIT330 (Fall 2008): Sites</title>
		<link>http://arnoldit.com/wordpress/2008/09/15/future-of-business-intelligence/comment-page-1/#comment-22945</link>
		<dc:creator>BIT330 (Fall 2008): Sites</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Sep 2008 11:49:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://arnoldit.com/wordpress/?p=1848#comment-22945</guid>
		<description>[...] Future of Business Intelligence [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Future of Business Intelligence [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Webb</title>
		<link>http://arnoldit.com/wordpress/2008/09/15/future-of-business-intelligence/comment-page-1/#comment-22943</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Webb</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Sep 2008 11:17:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://arnoldit.com/wordpress/?p=1848#comment-22943</guid>
		<description>Hi Stephen,

Thanks for the comments. I&#039;d like to clarify what I meant here (the original post was written in a bit of a rush): in the section you reference the point I was trying to make is that, in my opinion, the vast majority of people don&#039;t necessarily want to use BI tools as such - they want to use the tools they&#039;re familiar with to do BI. At the moment this means the majority of people want to do BI in Excel; in the future I&#039;m sure we&#039;ll have online spreadsheets which do the same things as Excel online (and Google Docs et al aren&#039;t quite there yet in my opinion, they&#039;re way too slow - which is I suppose part of the problem Chrome aims to solve) and new tools that take the place of spreadsheets, plus developments in social applications, IM and so on which hopefully will all link up together. So it&#039;s going to be the pace at which these tools develop that dictates the pace of BI in the cloud, and it&#039;s going to be companies like Google and Microsoft that develop these tools. There&#039;s still going to be ample space for the established BI players (including those you mentioned) to provide BI services, but my theory is that these services will be delivered through this second, more familiar, more widely used client tool layer. I&#039;m sure there will be the equivalent of today&#039;s specialised, standalone BI client tools too, but they&#039;ll need their equivalent of the all-important &#039;Export to Excel&#039; button...

Chris</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Stephen,</p>
<p>Thanks for the comments. I&#8217;d like to clarify what I meant here (the original post was written in a bit of a rush): in the section you reference the point I was trying to make is that, in my opinion, the vast majority of people don&#8217;t necessarily want to use BI tools as such &#8211; they want to use the tools they&#8217;re familiar with to do BI. At the moment this means the majority of people want to do BI in Excel; in the future I&#8217;m sure we&#8217;ll have online spreadsheets which do the same things as Excel online (and Google Docs et al aren&#8217;t quite there yet in my opinion, they&#8217;re way too slow &#8211; which is I suppose part of the problem Chrome aims to solve) and new tools that take the place of spreadsheets, plus developments in social applications, IM and so on which hopefully will all link up together. So it&#8217;s going to be the pace at which these tools develop that dictates the pace of BI in the cloud, and it&#8217;s going to be companies like Google and Microsoft that develop these tools. There&#8217;s still going to be ample space for the established BI players (including those you mentioned) to provide BI services, but my theory is that these services will be delivered through this second, more familiar, more widely used client tool layer. I&#8217;m sure there will be the equivalent of today&#8217;s specialised, standalone BI client tools too, but they&#8217;ll need their equivalent of the all-important &#8216;Export to Excel&#8217; button&#8230;</p>
<p>Chris</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
