<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: A Google Advertorial</title>
	<atom:link href="http://arnoldit.com/wordpress/2008/10/25/a-google-advertorial/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://arnoldit.com/wordpress/2008/10/25/a-google-advertorial/</link>
	<description>by Stephen E. Arnold</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 16:05:30 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stephen E. Arnold</title>
		<link>http://arnoldit.com/wordpress/2008/10/25/a-google-advertorial/comment-page-1/#comment-31123</link>
		<dc:creator>Stephen E. Arnold</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Nov 2008 02:27:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://arnoldit.com/wordpress/?p=2648#comment-31123</guid>
		<description>Endeca vs Google, 

Google objects to quite a bit these days. Layoffs, class stratification, and a slowing of the Google money machine make even superstars cranky.

Stephen Arnold, November 26, 2006</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Endeca vs Google, </p>
<p>Google objects to quite a bit these days. Layoffs, class stratification, and a slowing of the Google money machine make even superstars cranky.</p>
<p>Stephen Arnold, November 26, 2006</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Endeca vs. Google, Round 2 &#124; The Noisy Channel</title>
		<link>http://arnoldit.com/wordpress/2008/10/25/a-google-advertorial/comment-page-1/#comment-31098</link>
		<dc:creator>Endeca vs. Google, Round 2 &#124; The Noisy Channel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Nov 2008 19:20:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://arnoldit.com/wordpress/?p=2648#comment-31098</guid>
		<description>[...] Nitin Mangtani published a sponsored &#8220;commentary&#8221; on Forbes that some viewed as an advertorial (though Google objected to that [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Nitin Mangtani published a sponsored &#8220;commentary&#8221; on Forbes that some viewed as an advertorial (though Google objected to that [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fierce Pierce for Google Search Appliance : Beyond Search</title>
		<link>http://arnoldit.com/wordpress/2008/10/25/a-google-advertorial/comment-page-1/#comment-28157</link>
		<dc:creator>Fierce Pierce for Google Search Appliance : Beyond Search</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Nov 2008 05:03:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://arnoldit.com/wordpress/?p=2648#comment-28157</guid>
		<description>[...] was a good restatement of the Google game plan for enterprise search. I wrote about the essay here in Beyond Search, not really taking issue with the content or its assertions. I remain baffled why [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] was a good restatement of the Google game plan for enterprise search. I wrote about the essay here in Beyond Search, not really taking issue with the content or its assertions. I remain baffled why [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daniel Tunkelang</title>
		<link>http://arnoldit.com/wordpress/2008/10/25/a-google-advertorial/comment-page-1/#comment-26789</link>
		<dc:creator>Daniel Tunkelang</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Oct 2008 03:18:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://arnoldit.com/wordpress/?p=2648#comment-26789</guid>
		<description>I thought about calling it an advertorial, but I decided to give Google and Forbes the benefit of the doubt. Still, I agree with you that I didn&#039;t find the article very compelling.

Some discussion over at The Noisy Channel:
http://thenoisychannel.com/2008/10/25/google-defends-its-appliance/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I thought about calling it an advertorial, but I decided to give Google and Forbes the benefit of the doubt. Still, I agree with you that I didn&#8217;t find the article very compelling.</p>
<p>Some discussion over at The Noisy Channel:<br />
<a href="http://thenoisychannel.com/2008/10/25/google-defends-its-appliance/" rel="nofollow">http://thenoisychannel.com/2008/10/25/google-defends-its-appliance/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stephen E. Arnold</title>
		<link>http://arnoldit.com/wordpress/2008/10/25/a-google-advertorial/comment-page-1/#comment-26636</link>
		<dc:creator>Stephen E. Arnold</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Oct 2008 18:23:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://arnoldit.com/wordpress/?p=2648#comment-26636</guid>
		<description>Brian

I am delighted you find the addled goose&#039;s comments useful. I know for a fact that Google thinks I should be killed, defeathered, and turned into paté. Quite an honor, don&#039;t you agree?

Stephen Arnold, October 25, 2008</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Brian</p>
<p>I am delighted you find the addled goose&#8217;s comments useful. I know for a fact that Google thinks I should be killed, defeathered, and turned into paté. Quite an honor, don&#8217;t you agree?</p>
<p>Stephen Arnold, October 25, 2008</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian</title>
		<link>http://arnoldit.com/wordpress/2008/10/25/a-google-advertorial/comment-page-1/#comment-26624</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Oct 2008 13:51:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://arnoldit.com/wordpress/?p=2648#comment-26624</guid>
		<description>You&#039;re a great blogger, Stephen.  I appreciate your familiarity with both enterprise search and publishing, and this article was particularly insightful on both topics.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You&#8217;re a great blogger, Stephen.  I appreciate your familiarity with both enterprise search and publishing, and this article was particularly insightful on both topics.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

