Comments on: Exalead: Voice to Text http://arnoldit.com/wordpress/2008/11/03/exalead-voice-to-text/ by Stephen E. Arnold Sat, 11 Feb 2012 16:05:30 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 By: Le blog d'Aurigance Développement http://arnoldit.com/wordpress/2008/11/03/exalead-voice-to-text/comment-page-1/#comment-38432 Le blog d'Aurigance Développement Tue, 03 Feb 2009 14:25:11 +0000 http://arnoldit.com/wordpress/?p=2794#comment-38432 [...] Exalead: Voice to Text (arnoldit.com) [...] [...] Exalead: Voice to Text (arnoldit.com) [...]

]]> By: Activeille | Voxalead, un moteur de recherche vocale | Veille et intelligence économique pour les PME TPE http://arnoldit.com/wordpress/2008/11/03/exalead-voice-to-text/comment-page-1/#comment-38065 Activeille | Voxalead, un moteur de recherche vocale | Veille et intelligence économique pour les PME TPE Fri, 30 Jan 2009 08:14:10 +0000 http://arnoldit.com/wordpress/?p=2794#comment-38065 [...] Exalead: Voice to Text (arnoldit.com) [...] [...] Exalead: Voice to Text (arnoldit.com) [...]

]]> By: Stephen E. Arnold http://arnoldit.com/wordpress/2008/11/03/exalead-voice-to-text/comment-page-1/#comment-27927 Stephen E. Arnold Tue, 04 Nov 2008 06:58:13 +0000 http://arnoldit.com/wordpress/?p=2794#comment-27927 George Everitt Thanks for your comment. With the addled goose, you have to answer your own excellent questions. Stephen Arnold, November 4, 2008 George Everitt

Thanks for your comment. With the addled goose, you have to answer your own excellent questions.

Stephen Arnold, November 4, 2008

]]> By: George Everitt http://arnoldit.com/wordpress/2008/11/03/exalead-voice-to-text/comment-page-1/#comment-27825 George Everitt Mon, 03 Nov 2008 14:38:50 +0000 http://arnoldit.com/wordpress/?p=2794#comment-27825 I'm not sure what to make of that transcribed text. Are you illustrating the inadequacy of modern speech to text algorithms, even in the face of decades of research? "Voice to text ... well done" Is that irony or cynicism? The text looks like random Bayesian spam filter chaff. I'm not trying to be controversial - but... huh? I must be missing something. I’m not sure what to make of that transcribed text. Are you illustrating the inadequacy of modern speech to text algorithms, even in the face of decades of research?

“Voice to text … well done”

Is that irony or cynicism? The text looks like random Bayesian spam filter chaff.

I’m not trying to be controversial – but… huh? I must be missing something.

]]>