<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Google Log Data</title>
	<atom:link href="http://arnoldit.com/wordpress/2008/11/05/google-log-data/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://arnoldit.com/wordpress/2008/11/05/google-log-data/</link>
	<description>by Stephen E. Arnold</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 24 May 2012 16:47:40 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian</title>
		<link>http://arnoldit.com/wordpress/2008/11/05/google-log-data/comment-page-1/#comment-28077</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Nov 2008 19:34:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://arnoldit.com/wordpress/?p=2837#comment-28077</guid>
		<description>Curious that Chrome&#039;s smart address bar does not &quot;include data like a user&#039;s IP address,&quot; yet Google&#039;s back-end &quot;anonymizes the data within 24 hours.&quot;  Why anonymize if it&#039;s anonymous?

It sounds to me like Google&#039;s definition of &quot;data like a user&#039;s IP address&quot; doesn&#039;t include information about the Google user logged in at the time a search was performed, which, of course, is even more helpful to individually identify the human being who performed that specific search.  If this is the case then Google has chosen to answer this question in a very misleading way.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Curious that Chrome&#8217;s smart address bar does not &#8220;include data like a user&#8217;s IP address,&#8221; yet Google&#8217;s back-end &#8220;anonymizes the data within 24 hours.&#8221;  Why anonymize if it&#8217;s anonymous?</p>
<p>It sounds to me like Google&#8217;s definition of &#8220;data like a user&#8217;s IP address&#8221; doesn&#8217;t include information about the Google user logged in at the time a search was performed, which, of course, is even more helpful to individually identify the human being who performed that specific search.  If this is the case then Google has chosen to answer this question in a very misleading way.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

