<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Microsoft Architect Heads to Amazon</title>
	<atom:link href="http://arnoldit.com/wordpress/2008/12/13/microsoft-architect-heads-to-amazon/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://arnoldit.com/wordpress/2008/12/13/microsoft-architect-heads-to-amazon/</link>
	<description>by Stephen E. Arnold</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 08:48:26 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Weekend Wrap-up, search engine news of the week (Dec 14) &#124; Wiadomo?ci seo</title>
		<link>http://arnoldit.com/wordpress/2008/12/13/microsoft-architect-heads-to-amazon/comment-page-1/#comment-100274</link>
		<dc:creator>Weekend Wrap-up, search engine news of the week (Dec 14) &#124; Wiadomo?ci seo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Mar 2010 10:54:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://arnoldit.com/wordpress/?p=3500#comment-100274</guid>
		<description>[...] Microsoft Architect Heads to Amazon [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Microsoft Architect Heads to Amazon [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TJGodel</title>
		<link>http://arnoldit.com/wordpress/2008/12/13/microsoft-architect-heads-to-amazon/comment-page-1/#comment-33284</link>
		<dc:creator>TJGodel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Dec 2008 00:43:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://arnoldit.com/wordpress/?p=3500#comment-33284</guid>
		<description>My impression is that Microsoft is focused on it&#039;s technology and not necessary the best technology for the job.  How can it be other other way? What is Microsoft&#039;s legacy? Look at Microsoft&#039;s organization structure versus Google&#039;s.  It will take a massive change in Microsoft&#039;s DNA for it to compete with Google.  Microsoft&#039;s Cloud Computing effort, Azul, is just plain marketing, nothing more.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My impression is that Microsoft is focused on it&#8217;s technology and not necessary the best technology for the job.  How can it be other other way? What is Microsoft&#8217;s legacy? Look at Microsoft&#8217;s organization structure versus Google&#8217;s.  It will take a massive change in Microsoft&#8217;s DNA for it to compete with Google.  Microsoft&#8217;s Cloud Computing effort, Azul, is just plain marketing, nothing more.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
