Comments on: Ah, Ha, Guha: Semantics Are Coming http://arnoldit.com/wordpress/2009/01/23/ah-ha-guha-semantics-are-coming/ by Stephen E. Arnold Sun, 12 Feb 2012 09:55:49 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 By: Stephen E. Arnold http://arnoldit.com/wordpress/2009/01/23/ah-ha-guha-semantics-are-coming/comment-page-1/#comment-37597 Stephen E. Arnold Sat, 24 Jan 2009 13:54:09 +0000 http://arnoldit.com/wordpress/?p=4255#comment-37597 Ben Toth, Have you read Ramanathan Guha's February 2007 patent sequence? May provide some context against which to measure your comments. Stephen Arnold, January 24, 2009 Ben Toth,

Have you read Ramanathan Guha’s February 2007 patent sequence? May provide some context against which to measure your comments.

Stephen Arnold, January 24, 2009

]]> By: Ben Toth http://arnoldit.com/wordpress/2009/01/23/ah-ha-guha-semantics-are-coming/comment-page-1/#comment-37569 Ben Toth Sat, 24 Jan 2009 05:42:16 +0000 http://arnoldit.com/wordpress/?p=4255#comment-37569 It makes sense for Google to be in semantics. But that's not the same as being interested in the Semantic Web, whose approach Sergey Brin dismissed a few years back, saying something like 'semantic computing won't be achieved by putting angle brackets around words' He also has a long term technical engagement in this area - http://portal.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=336644 . You've probably covered this in your report but I can't tell as this price is too high for me! It makes sense for Google to be in semantics. But that’s not the same as being interested in the Semantic Web, whose approach Sergey Brin dismissed a few years back, saying something like ‘semantic computing won’t be achieved by putting angle brackets around words’ He also has a long term technical engagement in this area – http://portal.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=336644 . You’ve probably covered this in your report but I can’t tell as this price is too high for me!

]]>