<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Microsoft Live Search Enhancements</title>
	<atom:link href="http://arnoldit.com/wordpress/2009/02/05/microsoft-live-search-enhancements/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://arnoldit.com/wordpress/2009/02/05/microsoft-live-search-enhancements/</link>
	<description>by Stephen E. Arnold</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 09:55:49 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stephen E. Arnold</title>
		<link>http://arnoldit.com/wordpress/2009/02/05/microsoft-live-search-enhancements/comment-page-1/#comment-42515</link>
		<dc:creator>Stephen E. Arnold</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Mar 2009 18:09:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://arnoldit.com/wordpress/?p=4463#comment-42515</guid>
		<description>Otis,

Good list. Some others include the search functions in XP, Vista, and Windows 7.  Powerset semantic functions in Live and one other place. The R&amp;D search functions that pop up on the MSFT R&amp;D sites. The search function in Dynamics. The &quot;flavors&quot; of search in SharePoint. The &quot;flavors&quot; of search in Fast. I made a list in 2006 but grew tired of trying to figure out [a] who was in charge of these different code bases and [b] how these systems differ. I am confident the people pitching the notion that search is simple and stable will have a great list containing the &quot;real&quot; answer.

Stephen Arnold, March 1, 2009</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Otis,</p>
<p>Good list. Some others include the search functions in XP, Vista, and Windows 7.  Powerset semantic functions in Live and one other place. The R&#038;D search functions that pop up on the MSFT R&#038;D sites. The search function in Dynamics. The &#8220;flavors&#8221; of search in SharePoint. The &#8220;flavors&#8221; of search in Fast. I made a list in 2006 but grew tired of trying to figure out [a] who was in charge of these different code bases and [b] how these systems differ. I am confident the people pitching the notion that search is simple and stable will have a great list containing the &#8220;real&#8221; answer.</p>
<p>Stephen Arnold, March 1, 2009</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Otis Gospodnetic</title>
		<link>http://arnoldit.com/wordpress/2009/02/05/microsoft-live-search-enhancements/comment-page-1/#comment-42322</link>
		<dc:creator>Otis Gospodnetic</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Feb 2009 20:15:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://arnoldit.com/wordpress/?p=4463#comment-42322</guid>
		<description>How many different search code bases does MSFT have?
Search in MS SQL Server
Search in SharePoint
Search in Outlook (I thought it was .Net version of Lucene?)
Search in FAST ESP
Search on live.com
....
I bet they are all different code bases.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How many different search code bases does MSFT have?<br />
Search in MS SQL Server<br />
Search in SharePoint<br />
Search in Outlook (I thought it was .Net version of Lucene?)<br />
Search in FAST ESP<br />
Search on live.com<br />
&#8230;.<br />
I bet they are all different code bases.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

