<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Oh, Oh, SEO Debunked</title>
	<atom:link href="http://arnoldit.com/wordpress/2009/02/07/oh-oh-seo-debunked/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://arnoldit.com/wordpress/2009/02/07/oh-oh-seo-debunked/</link>
	<description>by Stephen E. Arnold</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 24 May 2012 16:47:40 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Oh, Oh, SEO Debunked : Beyond Search &#124; SEO News &#38; Views</title>
		<link>http://arnoldit.com/wordpress/2009/02/07/oh-oh-seo-debunked/comment-page-1/#comment-38863</link>
		<dc:creator>Oh, Oh, SEO Debunked : Beyond Search &#124; SEO News &#38; Views</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Feb 2009 16:02:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://arnoldit.com/wordpress/?p=4509#comment-38863</guid>
		<description>[...] View post:  Oh, Oh, SEO Debunked : Beyond Search [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] View post:  Oh, Oh, SEO Debunked : Beyond Search [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stephen E. Arnold</title>
		<link>http://arnoldit.com/wordpress/2009/02/07/oh-oh-seo-debunked/comment-page-1/#comment-38853</link>
		<dc:creator>Stephen E. Arnold</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Feb 2009 14:29:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://arnoldit.com/wordpress/?p=4509#comment-38853</guid>
		<description>Andrew Girdwood,

Would it not be easier if Buffie and Trent, the marketing majors, followed Google&#039;s Webmaster guidelines and wrote substantive, interesting, and well formed content? SEO is little more than the digital equivalent of trying to steal candy from Mr. Webber&#039;s candy display.

Stephen Arnold, February 7, 2009</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Andrew Girdwood,</p>
<p>Would it not be easier if Buffie and Trent, the marketing majors, followed Google&#8217;s Webmaster guidelines and wrote substantive, interesting, and well formed content? SEO is little more than the digital equivalent of trying to steal candy from Mr. Webber&#8217;s candy display.</p>
<p>Stephen Arnold, February 7, 2009</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew Girdwood</title>
		<link>http://arnoldit.com/wordpress/2009/02/07/oh-oh-seo-debunked/comment-page-1/#comment-38844</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew Girdwood</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Feb 2009 13:20:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://arnoldit.com/wordpress/?p=4509#comment-38844</guid>
		<description>There are different flavours of SEO. I love doing SEO and a core rule where I work is Never Try To Trick.

I agree entirely, it makes no sense to try and trick Google. Talk about picking a battle you cannot win.

I&#039;m happy to say trickery SEO should be debunked. However, it&#039;s also &quot;SEO&quot; to explain to the big brand that the reason Google doesn&#039;t seem to care for their website is because it&#039;s their .ca copy of their entirely Flash .com site. Telling the big brand that they need to add original and quality content - the sort that people would be happy to cite/link to/recommend - is the way forward.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There are different flavours of SEO. I love doing SEO and a core rule where I work is Never Try To Trick.</p>
<p>I agree entirely, it makes no sense to try and trick Google. Talk about picking a battle you cannot win.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m happy to say trickery SEO should be debunked. However, it&#8217;s also &#8220;SEO&#8221; to explain to the big brand that the reason Google doesn&#8217;t seem to care for their website is because it&#8217;s their .ca copy of their entirely Flash .com site. Telling the big brand that they need to add original and quality content &#8211; the sort that people would be happy to cite/link to/recommend &#8211; is the way forward.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

