<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Google Fumbles Government Ball</title>
	<atom:link href="http://arnoldit.com/wordpress/2009/02/14/google-fumbles-government-ball/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://arnoldit.com/wordpress/2009/02/14/google-fumbles-government-ball/</link>
	<description>by Stephen E. Arnold</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 24 May 2012 16:47:40 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Google: Dilemma Possible in Federal Sales Push : Beyond Search</title>
		<link>http://arnoldit.com/wordpress/2009/02/14/google-fumbles-government-ball/comment-page-1/#comment-41253</link>
		<dc:creator>Google: Dilemma Possible in Federal Sales Push : Beyond Search</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Feb 2009 05:02:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://arnoldit.com/wordpress/?p=4634#comment-41253</guid>
		<description>[...] The story that ran in MarketWatch about Google&#8217;s making only $4,000 in sales to the Federal government in 2008. I mentioned this in the context of a major news outlet&#8217;s amazing ability to create the impression that Google&#8217;s presence in the US government is only slightly more than buying a Kentucky influence peddler to get a road repaved. Ludicrous. Wrong. Uninformed. Why&#8217;s this important? Whoever wrote the story doesn&#8217;t know much about government procurements, the General Services Administration, and Google&#8217;s growing footprint in agencies. Not surprising. Most experts find their information via Google and calls to some well-worn contacts. Little wonder Google was positioned as an incompetent loser in the Federal market. Totally wrong. Refresh your memory of this write up here. My write up is here. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] The story that ran in MarketWatch about Google&#8217;s making only $4,000 in sales to the Federal government in 2008. I mentioned this in the context of a major news outlet&#8217;s amazing ability to create the impression that Google&#8217;s presence in the US government is only slightly more than buying a Kentucky influence peddler to get a road repaved. Ludicrous. Wrong. Uninformed. Why&#8217;s this important? Whoever wrote the story doesn&#8217;t know much about government procurements, the General Services Administration, and Google&#8217;s growing footprint in agencies. Not surprising. Most experts find their information via Google and calls to some well-worn contacts. Little wonder Google was positioned as an incompetent loser in the Federal market. Totally wrong. Refresh your memory of this write up here. My write up is here. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

