<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Autonomy IDOL Metrics</title>
	<atom:link href="http://arnoldit.com/wordpress/2009/03/03/autonomy-idol-metrics/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://arnoldit.com/wordpress/2009/03/03/autonomy-idol-metrics/</link>
	<description>by Stephen E. Arnold</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 16:05:30 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sabina Obenauer</title>
		<link>http://arnoldit.com/wordpress/2009/03/03/autonomy-idol-metrics/comment-page-1/#comment-210453</link>
		<dc:creator>Sabina Obenauer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Aug 2011 21:27:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://arnoldit.com/wordpress/?p=5014#comment-210453</guid>
		<description>Really enjoyed this post, is there any way I can receive an email whenever you make a new article?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Really enjoyed this post, is there any way I can receive an email whenever you make a new article?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Enterprise Search Solutions</title>
		<link>http://arnoldit.com/wordpress/2009/03/03/autonomy-idol-metrics/comment-page-1/#comment-186802</link>
		<dc:creator>Enterprise Search Solutions</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Jul 2011 19:21:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://arnoldit.com/wordpress/?p=5014#comment-186802</guid>
		<description>Just to add on to a previous posters comment - MaxxCAT offer two solid competitors to both Google Mini and GSA.  MaxxCAT search appliances can perform queries at up to 16x faster speeds, can perform third-party site crawls, cost thousands less and offer lifetime perpetual use.  You can even see a side by side demonstration of MaxxCAT&#039;s offerings with the Google competition at http://www.maxxcat.com/compare-enterprise-search-appliance.html.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just to add on to a previous posters comment &#8211; MaxxCAT offer two solid competitors to both Google Mini and GSA.  MaxxCAT search appliances can perform queries at up to 16x faster speeds, can perform third-party site crawls, cost thousands less and offer lifetime perpetual use.  You can even see a side by side demonstration of MaxxCAT&#8217;s offerings with the Google competition at <a href="http://www.maxxcat.com/compare-enterprise-search-appliance.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.maxxcat.com/compare-enterprise-search-appliance.html</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Confluence: Product Marketing</title>
		<link>http://arnoldit.com/wordpress/2009/03/03/autonomy-idol-metrics/comment-page-1/#comment-72616</link>
		<dc:creator>Confluence: Product Marketing</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Oct 2009 13:04:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://arnoldit.com/wordpress/?p=5014#comment-72616</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Performance Promotion...&lt;/strong&gt;

A program designed to build awareness of Digitial Reef&#039;s scale and performance profile. The target market includes consumers of eDiscovery solutions; Service Providers, Enterprise CIOs, Consultants and Law Firms.......</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Performance Promotion&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>A program designed to build awareness of Digitial Reef&#8217;s scale and performance profile. The target market includes consumers of eDiscovery solutions; Service Providers, Enterprise CIOs, Consultants and Law Firms&#8230;&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stephen E. Arnold</title>
		<link>http://arnoldit.com/wordpress/2009/03/03/autonomy-idol-metrics/comment-page-1/#comment-46394</link>
		<dc:creator>Stephen E. Arnold</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Mar 2009 02:05:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://arnoldit.com/wordpress/?p=5014#comment-46394</guid>
		<description>Unsigned,

Yep, but I charge for this information. Free info is availablie at www.arnoldit.com and this Web log. For info about for fee options, check out the About tab above.

Stephen Arnold, March 26, 2009</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Unsigned,</p>
<p>Yep, but I charge for this information. Free info is availablie at <a href="http://www.arnoldit.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.arnoldit.com</a> and this Web log. For info about for fee options, check out the About tab above.</p>
<p>Stephen Arnold, March 26, 2009</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: New to search</title>
		<link>http://arnoldit.com/wordpress/2009/03/03/autonomy-idol-metrics/comment-page-1/#comment-46363</link>
		<dc:creator>New to search</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Mar 2009 15:40:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://arnoldit.com/wordpress/?p=5014#comment-46363</guid>
		<description>I work in the legal space that requires us to search potentially relevant files across an enterprise is critical for us.  Can you unwrap the mystery (not to many IT terms) on idol vs lucene? Or is there a better alternative.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I work in the legal space that requires us to search potentially relevant files across an enterprise is critical for us.  Can you unwrap the mystery (not to many IT terms) on idol vs lucene? Or is there a better alternative.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: freddieMaize</title>
		<link>http://arnoldit.com/wordpress/2009/03/03/autonomy-idol-metrics/comment-page-1/#comment-45105</link>
		<dc:creator>freddieMaize</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Mar 2009 06:23:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://arnoldit.com/wordpress/?p=5014#comment-45105</guid>
		<description>Hi Stephen, the following news might interest you,

&quot;MaxxCat enterprise search solutions has its sights set on Google with a new product line that is up to 16 times faster than Google&#039;s search appliances. MaxxCat is aspiring to be the Google Search Appliance killer, boasting unlimited lifetime use, no artificial document size limitations, significantly lower price points, and a higher level of relevancy customization than any other search appliance on the market&quot;

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/29640642/

Regards</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Stephen, the following news might interest you,</p>
<p>&#8220;MaxxCat enterprise search solutions has its sights set on Google with a new product line that is up to 16 times faster than Google&#8217;s search appliances. MaxxCat is aspiring to be the Google Search Appliance killer, boasting unlimited lifetime use, no artificial document size limitations, significantly lower price points, and a higher level of relevancy customization than any other search appliance on the market&#8221;</p>
<p><a href="http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/29640642/" rel="nofollow">http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/29640642/</a></p>
<p>Regards</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stephen E. Arnold</title>
		<link>http://arnoldit.com/wordpress/2009/03/03/autonomy-idol-metrics/comment-page-1/#comment-43278</link>
		<dc:creator>Stephen E. Arnold</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Mar 2009 13:41:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://arnoldit.com/wordpress/?p=5014#comment-43278</guid>
		<description>Daniel Tunkelang,

The numbers mean something to the financial mavens who have to throw hardware at a search system to make the thing run at what the customer thinks is an acceptable pace. 

Stephen Arnold, March 5, 2009</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Daniel Tunkelang,</p>
<p>The numbers mean something to the financial mavens who have to throw hardware at a search system to make the thing run at what the customer thinks is an acceptable pace. </p>
<p>Stephen Arnold, March 5, 2009</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daniel Tunkelang</title>
		<link>http://arnoldit.com/wordpress/2009/03/03/autonomy-idol-metrics/comment-page-1/#comment-43209</link>
		<dc:creator>Daniel Tunkelang</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Mar 2009 01:43:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://arnoldit.com/wordpress/?p=5014#comment-43209</guid>
		<description>These are interesting numbers, even if they are of questionable provenance. But I don&#039;t see anything about the tasks being tested, or the effectiveness of the search engine at supporting the fulfillment of those tasks. Not to diminish the importance of indexing scale and query latency, but I&#039;d think the first thing you would want to measure is effectiveness for users, or at least some reasonable proxy for it.

Of course, effectiveness and hard to measure, as witnessed by the challenges of doing so even in the academic community. The IR community generally likes TREC (which emphasizes mean average precision on benchmark test collections), but we HCIR folks keep reminding them that TREC assumes a highly unrealistic batch model of information retrieval. The information scientists usually call for user studies, but those are prohibitively expensive to run on any significant scale. Quite a conundrum.

Of course, we can give up on all that and just produce numbers. But I wonder who will actually care about them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>These are interesting numbers, even if they are of questionable provenance. But I don&#8217;t see anything about the tasks being tested, or the effectiveness of the search engine at supporting the fulfillment of those tasks. Not to diminish the importance of indexing scale and query latency, but I&#8217;d think the first thing you would want to measure is effectiveness for users, or at least some reasonable proxy for it.</p>
<p>Of course, effectiveness and hard to measure, as witnessed by the challenges of doing so even in the academic community. The IR community generally likes TREC (which emphasizes mean average precision on benchmark test collections), but we HCIR folks keep reminding them that TREC assumes a highly unrealistic batch model of information retrieval. The information scientists usually call for user studies, but those are prohibitively expensive to run on any significant scale. Quite a conundrum.</p>
<p>Of course, we can give up on all that and just produce numbers. But I wonder who will actually care about them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ben</title>
		<link>http://arnoldit.com/wordpress/2009/03/03/autonomy-idol-metrics/comment-page-1/#comment-43191</link>
		<dc:creator>Ben</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Mar 2009 23:43:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://arnoldit.com/wordpress/?p=5014#comment-43191</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve had some exposure to Autonomy over the years and have mixed feelings. Anyone remember Kenjin? One way to get a feel for these metrics in practice would be for Autonomy to index Medline (and the full text of research papers where available) and let us all play with the result for a few weeks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve had some exposure to Autonomy over the years and have mixed feelings. Anyone remember Kenjin? One way to get a feel for these metrics in practice would be for Autonomy to index Medline (and the full text of research papers where available) and let us all play with the result for a few weeks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Yahoo BOSS Queries per Second : Beyond Search</title>
		<link>http://arnoldit.com/wordpress/2009/03/03/autonomy-idol-metrics/comment-page-1/#comment-43153</link>
		<dc:creator>Yahoo BOSS Queries per Second : Beyond Search</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Mar 2009 14:28:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://arnoldit.com/wordpress/?p=5014#comment-43153</guid>
		<description>[...] readers have commented via the blog feedback and by email about the Autonomy metrics I summarized here. To provide some baseline data, I dipped into my search archive an located an item that appeared in [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] readers have commented via the blog feedback and by email about the Autonomy metrics I summarized here. To provide some baseline data, I dipped into my search archive an located an item that appeared in [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

