<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Microsoft Fast Strategy Shift</title>
	<atom:link href="http://arnoldit.com/wordpress/2009/03/26/microsoft-fast-strategy-shift/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://arnoldit.com/wordpress/2009/03/26/microsoft-fast-strategy-shift/</link>
	<description>by Stephen E. Arnold</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 09:55:49 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: In Search of Microsoft Search &#171; Unstructured Data Blog</title>
		<link>http://arnoldit.com/wordpress/2009/03/26/microsoft-fast-strategy-shift/comment-page-1/#comment-48563</link>
		<dc:creator>In Search of Microsoft Search &#171; Unstructured Data Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Apr 2009 03:16:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://arnoldit.com/wordpress/?p=5454#comment-48563</guid>
		<description>[...] with Microsoft SharePoint and after some twists and turns that is still the strategy - see this Beyond Search blog entry for more [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] with Microsoft SharePoint and after some twists and turns that is still the strategy &#8211; see this Beyond Search blog entry for more [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: George Everitt</title>
		<link>http://arnoldit.com/wordpress/2009/03/26/microsoft-fast-strategy-shift/comment-page-1/#comment-46936</link>
		<dc:creator>George Everitt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Apr 2009 19:46:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://arnoldit.com/wordpress/?p=5454#comment-46936</guid>
		<description>I have been puzzled about Microsoft&#039;s reluctance to commit full bore to a complete replacement of MOSS search with ESP.  

It would be a different story if MOSS search had any redeeming qualities, but it is stuck in the &#039;90s and built on a swamp.  Microsoft/FAST are letting a great opportunity slip through their fingers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have been puzzled about Microsoft&#8217;s reluctance to commit full bore to a complete replacement of MOSS search with ESP.  </p>
<p>It would be a different story if MOSS search had any redeeming qualities, but it is stuck in the &#8217;90s and built on a swamp.  Microsoft/FAST are letting a great opportunity slip through their fingers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

