<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Time Magazine, Owner of AOL: Google Has Won</title>
	<atom:link href="http://arnoldit.com/wordpress/2009/05/23/time-magazine-owner-of-aol-google-has-won/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://arnoldit.com/wordpress/2009/05/23/time-magazine-owner-of-aol-google-has-won/</link>
	<description>by Stephen E. Arnold</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 09:55:49 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: AOL for Sale: No Surprise There : Beyond Search</title>
		<link>http://arnoldit.com/wordpress/2009/05/23/time-magazine-owner-of-aol-google-has-won/comment-page-1/#comment-53465</link>
		<dc:creator>AOL for Sale: No Surprise There : Beyond Search</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 May 2009 14:44:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://arnoldit.com/wordpress/?p=6512#comment-53465</guid>
		<description>[...] Time Magazine pronounced Google the winner in search here, the addled goose was not surprised when he read in TechRadar that “AOL Set to Be Split from Time [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Time Magazine pronounced Google the winner in search here, the addled goose was not surprised when he read in TechRadar that “AOL Set to Be Split from Time [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

