<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Microsoft Advertising to Aim $80 Million Blast at GOOG</title>
	<atom:link href="http://arnoldit.com/wordpress/2009/05/25/microsoft-advertising-to-aim-80-million-blast-at-goog/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://arnoldit.com/wordpress/2009/05/25/microsoft-advertising-to-aim-80-million-blast-at-goog/</link>
	<description>by Stephen E. Arnold</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 24 May 2012 16:47:40 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave Hucker</title>
		<link>http://arnoldit.com/wordpress/2009/05/25/microsoft-advertising-to-aim-80-million-blast-at-goog/comment-page-1/#comment-53179</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave Hucker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 May 2009 16:45:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://arnoldit.com/wordpress/?p=6576#comment-53179</guid>
		<description>Lita, you&#039;re not alone.  Microsoft (and Yahoo! somewhat) has become the &#039;underdog&#039; of Search and there is always a popularity factor in being a redheaded stepchild of Search... Tech savvy search followers are always more than willing to check out a site which poses a risk to the top dog.  Deep down, we all love a good tussle.

While Brand is king, Buzz can also be a powerful factor in building brand...if (IF!) there is some actual gravitas behind the buzz. If not then it actually becomes a liability as there is an endless list of bloggers and critics lined up to pound  reality into the heads of the great pretenders.   http://technologizer.com/2009/05/19/a-brief-history-of-google-killers/2/

One thing that Google does that I&#039;m not particularly fond of is the rapid change of its search results display.  They&#039;ve changed localsearch algorithm which has effected the way local serps show up in the 10 pack.  They&#039;ve added the &quot;options&quot; feature giving the ability to refine the search results on a page.  Thanks but if I want to refine my search, I&#039;ll do it the old fashioned way.  but I guess not everyone knows how to refine a search, so its kinda like &#039;search for dummies&#039; :)

thanks for bringing us the news Stephen</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lita, you&#8217;re not alone.  Microsoft (and Yahoo! somewhat) has become the &#8216;underdog&#8217; of Search and there is always a popularity factor in being a redheaded stepchild of Search&#8230; Tech savvy search followers are always more than willing to check out a site which poses a risk to the top dog.  Deep down, we all love a good tussle.</p>
<p>While Brand is king, Buzz can also be a powerful factor in building brand&#8230;if (IF!) there is some actual gravitas behind the buzz. If not then it actually becomes a liability as there is an endless list of bloggers and critics lined up to pound  reality into the heads of the great pretenders.   <a href="http://technologizer.com/2009/05/19/a-brief-history-of-google-killers/2/" rel="nofollow">http://technologizer.com/2009/05/19/a-brief-history-of-google-killers/2/</a></p>
<p>One thing that Google does that I&#8217;m not particularly fond of is the rapid change of its search results display.  They&#8217;ve changed localsearch algorithm which has effected the way local serps show up in the 10 pack.  They&#8217;ve added the &#8220;options&#8221; feature giving the ability to refine the search results on a page.  Thanks but if I want to refine my search, I&#8217;ll do it the old fashioned way.  but I guess not everyone knows how to refine a search, so its kinda like &#8216;search for dummies&#8217; <img src='http://arnoldit.com/wordpress/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>thanks for bringing us the news Stephen</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lita</title>
		<link>http://arnoldit.com/wordpress/2009/05/25/microsoft-advertising-to-aim-80-million-blast-at-goog/comment-page-1/#comment-53169</link>
		<dc:creator>lita</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 May 2009 14:31:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://arnoldit.com/wordpress/?p=6576#comment-53169</guid>
		<description>I am very excited about this and in fact just picked up 1000 shares of Microsoft stock in anticipation of this ad campaign.  I&#039;d love to see MS take a gouge out of Google&#039;s market share.  

Case in point, the perception change of Apple vs Microsoft.  
http://adage.com/digital/article?article_id=136731

Apple value perception plummeted (like goog will?)  following its first competitive ad campaign. 

Bing is a happier name than google and I think people will have fun with it.
Time will tell I guess!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am very excited about this and in fact just picked up 1000 shares of Microsoft stock in anticipation of this ad campaign.  I&#8217;d love to see MS take a gouge out of Google&#8217;s market share.  </p>
<p>Case in point, the perception change of Apple vs Microsoft.<br />
<a href="http://adage.com/digital/article?article_id=136731" rel="nofollow">http://adage.com/digital/article?article_id=136731</a></p>
<p>Apple value perception plummeted (like goog will?)  following its first competitive ad campaign. </p>
<p>Bing is a happier name than google and I think people will have fun with it.<br />
Time will tell I guess!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

