<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Google, Microsoft, Yahoo Search Death Match</title>
	<atom:link href="http://arnoldit.com/wordpress/2009/06/15/google-microsoft-yahoo-search-death-match/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://arnoldit.com/wordpress/2009/06/15/google-microsoft-yahoo-search-death-match/</link>
	<description>by Stephen E. Arnold</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 09:55:49 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hugh</title>
		<link>http://arnoldit.com/wordpress/2009/06/15/google-microsoft-yahoo-search-death-match/comment-page-1/#comment-56117</link>
		<dc:creator>Hugh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Jun 2009 10:45:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://arnoldit.com/wordpress/?p=6999#comment-56117</guid>
		<description>Yes I got similar results (i.e. Google winning most of the time) but that was on fairly generic search terms. I wonder if Bing might be (maybe transiently) better on trending topics - Google seems to struggle in the &quot;real-time search&quot; domain.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes I got similar results (i.e. Google winning most of the time) but that was on fairly generic search terms. I wonder if Bing might be (maybe transiently) better on trending topics &#8211; Google seems to struggle in the &#8220;real-time search&#8221; domain.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

