Comments on: Wall Street Journal, Desperate and Ineffectual or Just Clueless http://arnoldit.com/wordpress/2009/06/29/wall-street-journal-desperate-and-ineffectual-or-just-clueless/ by Stephen E. Arnold Thu, 24 May 2012 16:47:40 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2 By: N. Courtney http://arnoldit.com/wordpress/2009/06/29/wall-street-journal-desperate-and-ineffectual-or-just-clueless/comment-page-1/#comment-58536 N. Courtney Thu, 02 Jul 2009 19:09:51 +0000 http://arnoldit.com/wordpress/?p=7281#comment-58536 Well I've never had nor do I want subscription to the Wall Street Journal, and I certainly wouldn't want one with them now, all they've done is piss me off. I've been getting two to three an hour, sometimes Spamassassin catches them on the server, but they're coming from different domains. It's funny, they did all these articles about how bad spam was, and here they are becoming a major spammer themselves. Well I’ve never had nor do I want subscription to the Wall Street Journal, and I certainly wouldn’t want one with them now, all they’ve done is piss me off. I’ve been getting two to three an hour, sometimes Spamassassin catches them on the server, but they’re coming from different domains.

It’s funny, they did all these articles about how bad spam was, and here they are becoming a major spammer themselves.

]]> By: Marydee http://arnoldit.com/wordpress/2009/06/29/wall-street-journal-desperate-and-ineffectual-or-just-clueless/comment-page-1/#comment-58051 Marydee Mon, 29 Jun 2009 20:21:48 +0000 http://arnoldit.com/wordpress/?p=7281#comment-58051 Should have typed Inviting not inving. Should have typed Inviting not inving.

]]> By: Marydee http://arnoldit.com/wordpress/2009/06/29/wall-street-journal-desperate-and-ineffectual-or-just-clueless/comment-page-1/#comment-58050 Marydee Mon, 29 Jun 2009 20:21:07 +0000 http://arnoldit.com/wordpress/?p=7281#comment-58050 Love that the Google ads accompanying this blog post were all from the Wall Street Journal inving new subscriptions. Irony is lost on algorithms, I suppose. Love that the Google ads accompanying this blog post were all from the Wall Street Journal inving new subscriptions. Irony is lost on algorithms, I suppose.

]]>