<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Social Media Talks but Not Stats</title>
	<atom:link href="http://arnoldit.com/wordpress/2009/11/01/social-media-talks-but-not-stats/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://arnoldit.com/wordpress/2009/11/01/social-media-talks-but-not-stats/</link>
	<description>by Stephen E. Arnold</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 24 May 2012 16:47:40 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: From Enterprise 2.0 Adoption to Business Value</title>
		<link>http://arnoldit.com/wordpress/2009/11/01/social-media-talks-but-not-stats/comment-page-1/#comment-77241</link>
		<dc:creator>From Enterprise 2.0 Adoption to Business Value</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 22:23:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://arnoldit.com/wordpress/?p=9188#comment-77241</guid>
		<description>[...] Social Media Talks but Not Stats (arnoldit.com) [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Social Media Talks but Not Stats (arnoldit.com) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fayez</title>
		<link>http://arnoldit.com/wordpress/2009/11/01/social-media-talks-but-not-stats/comment-page-1/#comment-77114</link>
		<dc:creator>Fayez</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 04:25:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://arnoldit.com/wordpress/?p=9188#comment-77114</guid>
		<description>I think Susan Scrupski is correct. Social media is more general than enterprise 2.0. Enterprise 2.0 is about using web 2.0 within organisations according to MacAfee first definition. MacAfee added that the use of web 2.0 within organisation, between organization and their partners and customers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think Susan Scrupski is correct. Social media is more general than enterprise 2.0. Enterprise 2.0 is about using web 2.0 within organisations according to MacAfee first definition. MacAfee added that the use of web 2.0 within organisation, between organization and their partners and customers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Susan Scrupski</title>
		<link>http://arnoldit.com/wordpress/2009/11/01/social-media-talks-but-not-stats/comment-page-1/#comment-77031</link>
		<dc:creator>Susan Scrupski</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Nov 2009 20:29:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://arnoldit.com/wordpress/?p=9188#comment-77031</guid>
		<description>Social Media and Enterprise 2.0 are not the same thing.  Social media (esp. content covered by mashable) is primarily focused on marketing/branding/customer communities.  Enterprise 2.0 is more internal than external-facing.  

That being said, ROI is still difficult to prove inside the Enterprise, but is not the best metric for proving the efficacy of e20 initiatives.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Social Media and Enterprise 2.0 are not the same thing.  Social media (esp. content covered by mashable) is primarily focused on marketing/branding/customer communities.  Enterprise 2.0 is more internal than external-facing.  </p>
<p>That being said, ROI is still difficult to prove inside the Enterprise, but is not the best metric for proving the efficacy of e20 initiatives.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

