Comments on: Ten Trends in Search for 2010 http://arnoldit.com/wordpress/2009/11/27/ten-trends-in-search-for-2010/ by Stephen E. Arnold Thu, 24 May 2012 16:47:40 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2 By: Dave Kellogg http://arnoldit.com/wordpress/2009/11/27/ten-trends-in-search-for-2010/comment-page-1/#comment-82325 Dave Kellogg Tue, 01 Dec 2009 17:39:34 +0000 http://arnoldit.com/wordpress/?p=9572#comment-82325 Having had six years of Latin and -- gasp -- an MBA, I comment with both joy and trepidation. Unfortunately, I won't be at London Online to witness the battle, but I'd like to comment on the first point: XML repositories will deliver content services that * actually * work and provide more information access functions than traditional search engines. Since you say you're tossing these points like a verutum (short javelin) I'm curious why you're tossing this one. If it's a prediction, then I'd toss it, too, because XML repositories *already are* underpinning content services that *actually* work and they most definitely provide more power than traditional text/keyword search engines. Other than that beef, I don't see what's wrong with the claim. But perhaps I'm blinded by my Mark Logicianship. Dave Having had six years of Latin and — gasp — an MBA, I comment with both joy and trepidation. Unfortunately, I won’t be at London Online to witness the battle, but I’d like to comment on the first point:

XML repositories will deliver content services that * actually * work and provide more information access functions than traditional search engines.

Since you say you’re tossing these points like a verutum (short javelin) I’m curious why you’re tossing this one. If it’s a prediction, then I’d toss it, too, because XML repositories *already are* underpinning content services that *actually* work and they most definitely provide more power than traditional text/keyword search engines.

Other than that beef, I don’t see what’s wrong with the claim. But perhaps I’m blinded by my Mark Logicianship.

Dave

]]>