<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Economist and Its Wobbly Approach to Online Revenue</title>
	<atom:link href="http://arnoldit.com/wordpress/2009/11/27/the-economist-and-its-wobbly-approach-to-online-revenue/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://arnoldit.com/wordpress/2009/11/27/the-economist-and-its-wobbly-approach-to-online-revenue/</link>
	<description>by Stephen E. Arnold</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 21 Mar 2010 00:07:32 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: &#187; On the possible Murdoch/Microsoft deal and other search engine news (Nov 29)</title>
		<link>http://arnoldit.com/wordpress/2009/11/27/the-economist-and-its-wobbly-approach-to-online-revenue/comment-page-1/#comment-82080</link>
		<dc:creator>&#187; On the possible Murdoch/Microsoft deal and other search engine news (Nov 29)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Nov 2009 15:36:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://arnoldit.com/wordpress/?p=9570#comment-82080</guid>
		<description>[...] The Economist and Its Wobbly Approach to Online Revenue [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] The Economist and Its Wobbly Approach to Online Revenue [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
