Google Books in Limbo: The Beat Goes On

November 29, 2009

I detect a note of glee in Alex Pham’s “Google’s Book-Scanning Deal Is Not Sealed Yet.”  Google keeps on scanning, and the publishing world keeps on fighting a rear guard action with too few troops and no supply line. Nevertheless, the Los Angeles Times writes:

Critics have argued that Congress, not a private lawsuit in federal court, is the appropriate venue to settle the conflict because its outcome could alter the rights of many people who may not be aware of the case. So even if Chin grants final approval, the settlement could remain mired in courts. Among those who have said they would appeal is Scott E. Gant, a class-action attorney with Boies, Schiller & Flexner. Gant filed a personal objection to the settlement in his role as an author of a book titled “We’re All Journalists Now: The Transformation of the Press and Reshaping of the Law in the Internet Age.” “I am gravely concerned about the rights of the absent class members who are either unaware or do not understand the implications of this settlement,” Gant said.  “It could be several years,” he added, “before we will see final resolution.”

And what will change? In my opinion, not too much. Google keeps on scanning and processing. Who is going to do the job? Any national libraries? Thomson Reuters? Reed Elsevier? A consortium of publishers? Too late in my view.

Stephen Arnold, November 29, 2009

I wish  to disclose to the Los Angeles County Sheriff’s Department that I was not paid to write this opinion.

Comments

Comments are closed.

  • Archives

  • Recent Posts

  • Meta