Featured

A Xoogler May Question the Google about Responsible and Ethical Smart Software

Write a research paper. Get colleagues to provide input. Well, ask colleagues do that work and what do you get. How about “Looks good.” Or “Add more zing to that chart.” Or “I’m snowed under so it will be a while but I will review it…” Then the paper wends its way to publication and a senior manager type reads the paper on a flight from one whiz kid town to another whiz kid town and says, “This is bad. Really bad because the paper points out that we fiddle with the outputs. And what we set up is biased to generate the most money possible from clueless humans under our span of control.” Finally, the paper is blocked from publication and the offending PhD is fired or sent signals that your future lies elsewhere.

image

Will this be a classic arm wrestling match? The winner may control quite a bit of conceptual territory along with knobs and dials to shape information.

Could this happen? Oh, yeah.

Ex Googler Timnit Gebru Starts Her Own AI Research Center” documents the next step, which may mean that some wizards undergarments will be sprayed with eau de poison oak for months, maybe years. Here’s one of the statements from the Wired article:

“Instead of fighting from the inside, I want to show a model for an independent institution with a different set of incentive structures,” says Gebru, who is founder and executive director of Distributed Artificial Intelligence Research (DAIR). The first part of the name is a reference to her aim to be more inclusive than most AI labs—which skew white, Western, and male—and to recruit people from parts of the world rarely represented in the tech industry. Gebru was ejected from Google after clashing with bosses over a research paper urging caution with new text-processing technology enthusiastically adopted by Google and other tech companies.

The main idea, which Wired and Dr. Gebru delicately sidestep, is that there are allegations of an artificial intelligence or machine learning cabal drifting around some conference hall chatter. On one side is the push for what I call the SAIL approach. The example I use to illustrate how this cost effective, speedy, and clever short cut approach works is illustrated in some of the work of Dr. Christopher Ré, the captain of the objective craft SAIL. Oh, is the acronym unfamiliar to you? SAIL is short version of Stanford Artificial Intelligence Laboratory. SAIL fits on the Snorkel content diving gear I think.

On the other side of the ocean, are Dr. Timnit Gebru’s fellow travelers. The difference is that Dr. Gebru believes that smart software should not reflect the wit, wisdom, biases, and general bro-ness of the high school science club culture. This culture, in my opinion, has contributed to the fraying of the social fabric in the US, caused harm, and erodes behaviors that are supposed to be subordinated to “just what people do to make a social system function smoothly.”

Does the Wired write up identify the alleged cabal? Nope.

Does the write up explain that the Ré / Snorkel methods sacrifice some precision in the rush to generate good enough outputs? (Good enough can be framed in terms of ad revenue, reduced costs, and faster time to market testing in my opinion.) Nope.

Does Dr. Gebru explain how insidious the short cut training of models is and how it will create systems which actively harm those outside the 60 percent threshold of certain statistical yardsticks? Heck, no.

Hopefully some bright researchers will explain what’s happening with a “deep dive”? Oh, right, Deep Dive is the name of a content access company which uses Dr. Ré’s methods. Ho, ho, ho. You didn’t know?

Beyond Search believes that Dr. Gebru has important contributions to make to applied smart software. Just hurry up already.

Stephen E Arnold, December 2, 2021

Interviews

DarkCyber, March 29, 2022: An Interview with Chris Westphal, DataWalk

Chris Westphal is the Chief Analytics Officer of DataWalk, a firm providing an investigative and analysis tool to commercial and government organizations. The 12-minute interview covers DataWalk’s unique capabilities, its data and information resources, and the firm’s workflow functionality. The video can be viewed on YouTube at this location.

Stephen E Arnold, March 29, 2022

Latest News

A Gentle Ripple in the Datasphere: Soft Fraud

Compared with some of the cyber behavior, soft fraud is a small fish, possibly a candiru. My definition of “soft fraud” is a behavior which does not violate... Read more »

May 18, 2022 | Comment

Systems and Software: Make Them Really Easy to Use

Isn’t software supposed to make work easier and more efficient? Even as reliance on technology in the workplace has increased, it appears to have become just... Read more »

May 18, 2022 | Comment

Choices: A Good Thing, Right?

Senior citizens are befuddled by modern times and one of the things that leave them flummoxed is the number of choices they face. It is not just senior citizens,... Read more »

May 18, 2022 | Comment

Data: Better Fresh

Decisions based on data are only as good as the data on which they are based. That seems obvious, but according to BetaNews, “Over 80 Percent of Companies... Read more »

May 18, 2022 | Comment

More Facebook Documents

Facebook apparently generates quite a few documents. In a time of abundance, some of the excess finds its way into places unexpected. “We’re Publishing the... Read more »

May 17, 2022 | Comment

Google, Smart Software, and Prime Mover for Hyperbole

In my experience, the cost of training smart software is very big problem. The bigness does not become evident until the licensee of a smart system realizes that... Read more »

May 17, 2022 | Comment

Differences Between Data Science And Business Intelligence

Data science is an encompassing term that is hard to define. Data science is an umbrella field that splinters in many directions. The Smart Data Collective explains... Read more »

May 17, 2022 | Comment

Big Tech, Big Winners: Good or Bad

Science-fiction and many different types of smart people have informed us that technology and related information is dangerous if unregulated and left in the hands... Read more »

May 17, 2022 | Comment

Does Google Have Search Fear?

I can hear the Googlers at an search engine optimization conference saying this: Our recent investments in search are designed to provide a better experience for... Read more »

May 16, 2022 | Comment

On Mitigating Open-Source Vulnerabilities

Open-source software has saved countless developers from reinventing the proverbial wheel so they can instead spend their time creating new ways to use existing... Read more »

May 16, 2022 | Comment


  • Archives

  • Recent Posts

  • Meta