Encarta: Content Is King and Wikipedia Is Arthurian

March 31, 2009

Content is king. More accurately, in the encyclopedia sector, Wikipedia is more kingly. Microsoft has figured out that it could not do what Encyclopedia Britannica, World Book, and other descendents of Denis Diederot failed to achieve. Encarta seems to be a stark reminder that money, confidence, and a desktop operating system monopoly don’t have the clout to displace a user-generated online reference service. If you are lucky, this link to the AFP story on Yahoo News will be available when you click here. For me the most interesting comment in the article was:

Encarta’s popularity faded after the nonprofit Wikipedia Foundation launched Wikipedia online in 2001.

I am surprised it took eight years for the Redmond company to see the writing on the Wikipedia Web site. Encarta’s search struck me as a bit wheezy. I use the GOOG to search Wikipedia, and I review the articles before I link to them. I think Wikipedia is quite good, certainly good enough to kill the multimedia, noisy, sluggish Encarta.

Stephen Arnold, March 31, 2009


One Response to “Encarta: Content Is King and Wikipedia Is Arthurian”

  1. A Child’s Eye View of Research « Advocate’s Studio on April 1st, 2009 1:20 pm

    […] Encarta: Content Is King and Wikipedia Is Arthurian (arnoldit.com) […]

  • Archives

  • Recent Posts

  • Meta