Microsoft Teams: More, More, More
January 12, 2021
Last week I was on a Zoom video call. Zoom is pretty easy to use. What’s interesting is that the cyber security organizer of the meeting could not figure out how to allow a participant to share a screen. Now how easy is it to use Microsoft Teams compared to Zoom? In my opinion, Microsoft Teams is a baffler. The last thing Teams needs is another dose of featuritis. Teams and Zoom both need to deal with the craziness of the existing features and functions.
I have given up on Zoom improving its interface. The tiny gear icon, one of the most used components, is tough for some people to spot. Teams has a couple of donkeys laden with wackiness; for example, how about those access controls? Working great for new users, right? But Microsoft who is busy reinventing itself from Word and SharePoint wants to be the super Slack of our Rona-ized world. Sounds good? Yep, ads within Office 10 are truly an uplifting experience for individuals who use Windows 10 to sort of attempt work. Plus, Teams adds Channel calendars. Great! More calendars! Many Outlooks, many search systems, and now calendars! In Teams!
I noted this BBC write up: “Pupils in Scotland Struggle to Get Online Amid Microsoft Issue.” I thought teachers, parents were there to help. The Beeb states:
A number of schools, pupils and parents have reported the technology running slowly or not at all.
What’s Microsoft say? According to the Beeb:
A Microsoft spokesperson said: “Our engineers are working to resolve difficulties accessing Microsoft Teams that some customers are experiencing.” When pressed on whether demand as a result of home schooling was causing the issue, Microsoft declined to comment.
Just like the SolarWinds’ misstep? Nope, just working to make Teams more interesting. Navigate to “Microsoft Teams Is Getting a More Engaging Experience for Meetings Soon.” If the write up is accurate, that’s exactly what Microsoft has planned for its Zoom killer. The write up reports an item from the future:
Microsoft is working on making Teams meetings more engaging using AI and a “Dynamic View” to give more control over meeting presentations.
And what, pray tell, is a more engaging enhancement or two? I learned that in the future (not yet determined):
The Dynamic view is said to let you see what’s being shared and other people on the call at the same time. With the call being automatically optimized in a way that lets participants both see the important information that’s being shared and the people presenting it in a satisfying way.
News flash. The features appear to add controls (hooray, more controls) and the presentation seems just fine for those high-resolution displays measured in feet, not inches.
Bulletin. Just in. More people are using mobile devices than desktop computers. How is Teams on a mobile device with a screen measured in inches, not feet?
Oh, right. Featuritis and tiny displays. Winners. Maybe not for someone over the age of 45, but that’s an irrelevant demographic, right?
Stephen E Arnold, January 12, 2021
Microsoft: Information Released Like a Gentle Solar Wind
December 31, 2020
I read the New Year’s Eve missive from Microsoft, a company which tries to be “transparent, “Microsoft Internal Solorigate Investigation Update.” I am not sure, but I think the Microsoft Word spell checker does not know that SolarWinds is not spelled Solarigate. Maybe Microsoft is writing about some other security breach or prefers a neologism to end the fine year 2020?
Here’s a passage I found interesting:
Our investigation has, however, revealed attempted activities beyond just the presence of malicious SolarWinds code in our environment. This activity has not put at risk the security of our services or any customer data, but we want to be transparent and share what we’re learning as we combat what we believe is a very sophisticated nation-state actor. We detected unusual activity with a small number of internal accounts and upon review, we discovered one account had been used to view source code in a number of source code repositories. The account did not have permissions to modify any code or engineering systems and our investigation further confirmed no changes were made. These accounts were investigated and remediated. [Bold added to highlight intriguing statements]
To me, an old person who lives in rural Kentucky, it sure sounds as if Microsoft is downplaying:
- Malicious code within Microsoft’s systems
- The code performed “unusual activity” whatever this actually means I don’t know
- The malicious code made it to MSFT source code repositories
- Whatever happened has allegedly been fixed up.
What’s that unknown unknowns idea? Microsoft may be writing as if there are no unknown unknowns related to the SolarWinds misstep.
If you want more timely Solarigate misstep info, here’s what Microsoft suggests as a New Year’s Eve diversion:
For the up-to-date information and guidance, please visit our resource center at https://aka.ms/solorigate.
Stephen E Arnold, December 31, 2020
Score Your Business Meetings: I Usually Award Fs
December 10, 2020
COVID-19 made Zoom a necessary tool. YouTube and TikTok are filled with Zoom call mistakes from students pranking classes, pets interrupting calls, and people forgetting to wear pants. While Zoom inadvertently changed the way business meetings are conducted, it has not changed how boring they are. TechSpot reports that emotions might change when it comes to meetings because “Microsoft Patents Technology That Can ‘Score’ Meetings Based On Facial Expressions And Body Language.”
Technologists are already obsessed with sympathetic metadata, AI mining the Internet for emotional content, while YouTubers and other streamers are equally obsessed with positive feedback and gaining subscribers. Microsoft has combined both these trends into an “insight computer system” that relies on AI to interpret meeting participants and scores them. The scoring system takes body language, facial expressions, room temperature, time of day, and attendance numbers into consideration.
Business meetings are boring and usually do not augment productivity. Remote working has changed the game, because attendees can goof off more than when they are physically present. Microsoft designed the sentimental conference rating system to analyze participants and help businesses determine if a meeting was successful. It sounds more like a Orwellian monitoring tool:
“GeekWire notes that the company was criticized for enabling what appears to be workplace surveillance when it rolled out its “Productivity Score” feature in October. Wolfie Christl of the independent Cracked Labs digital research institute in Vienna, Austria, writes that it allows managers to see the “number of days an employee has been sending emails, using the chat, using ‘mentions’ in emails etc,” turning Microsoft 365 into a full-fledged workplace surveillance tool. Microsoft, of course, insists that Productivity Score does not spy on workers.”
Microsoft has reversed course, after asserting that its tools are not used to spy on people. Good to know. I score my most recent meeting an F.
Whitney Grace, December 10, 2020
Teams: Its Future Seems to Be Emulating the Feature-itis of MSFT Word
December 10, 2020
Someone asked me to test Zoom in 2016, maybe earlier. It was a lot more useful than Freeconference.com’s IBM video service which was available to me at the time. Zoom is getting more cluttered. I have to deal with automated calendar, endless updates, icon litter, and weird controls scattered across the Web site, the app for my Mac Mini, and the Web browser implementation. I can record and probably acquire a Zoom brain implant add in.
But Microsoft Teams makes Zoom’s accretion of wonkiness look very 16th century. I read “Features Added to Microsoft Teams in November 2020 Update.” My reaction was a question, “Has Microsoft discovered its next Microsoft Office?” (I was tempted to mention Microsoft Bob and Microsoft SharePoint, but I de-enthusiasmed myself.)
What’s Teams do? For starters, you can check out Microsoft’s explanation of “more ways to be a team.” Typical of thumbtypers’ marketing woo woo, Teams is linked to Microsoft 365. Okay, I get it a subscription and/or volume licensing with a dollop of lock in. Imagine. meet, chat, call, and collaborate in just one place. Also, one can:
- Instantly go from group chat to video call with the touch of a button.
- Securely connect, access, share, and coauthor files in real time.
- Stay organized by keeping notes, documents, and your calendar together.
However, Teams is an application environment too. The November 2020 write up points out:
Microsoft now made the new Power Apps app for Teams generally available. It allows you to create and deploy custom apps without leaving Teams. With the straightforward , embedded graphical app studio, it’s never been easier to create low code apps for Teams. you’ll also harness immediate value from inbuilt templates just like the Great Ideas or Inspections apps, which may be deployed in one click and customized easily. The new Power Apps app for Teams are often backed by a replacement relational datastore – Dataverse for Teams.
The “dataverse.” That’s similar to my term “datasphere,” but the datasphere exists and includes the dataverse in my opinion.
Yep, the “world” of Microsoft. What’s interesting is that Salesforce understands that Microsoft’s response to Zoom may be the start of a new bit thing. Even Amazon has joined the party with its mostly ignored Chime thing. (Amazon AWS provides the zoom for Zoom, so for now, the Bezos bulldozer is carving new revenue paths in other markets.) And Google is active in this sector as well, but for the life of me, I cannot recall the name of the conference/messaging service du jour. Google sells ads and will probably get serious when a US government Department of Energy conference call can be enhanced with an advertisement from Duke Energy or Exxon).
One thing is clear in my opinion: Microsoft Teams has the feature-itis affliction. I was at a Microsoft meeting years ago when one of the Softies pointed out that 95 percent of Word users relied on fewer than 10 functions.
What do I do when I use Zoom? Participate in a video call. If I need to take notes, I use a pencil and paper. If I need to add an event to my calendar, I write it in my monthly planner. If I want to zone out, I post a background that shows me looking at the camera and nodding.
Keep it simple? Not likely.
Stephen E Arnold, December 10, 2020
Interesting Post on Microsoft Github: Teams Vulnerability
December 9, 2020
I found this interesting post on Github, one of Microsoft’s open source plays. “Important, Spoofing” – Zero-Click, Wormable, Cross-Platform Remote Code Execution in Microsoft Teams.” The post explains how to compromise a Teams environment by sending or editing an existing Teams message. The message looks just peachy to the recipients or recipients. Teams is plural. When the recipient looks at the message the malicious payload executes. The post points out:
That’s it. There is no further interaction from the victim. Now your company’s internal network, personal documents, 365 documents/mail/notes, secret chats are fully compromised. Think about it. One message, one channel, no interaction. Everyone gets exploited.
Microsoft calls the exploit spoofing. Keep in mind that Microsoft has more than 100 million active users of its Zoom killer.
Stephen E Arnold, December 9, 2020
LinkedIn Analyzed: Verrry Interesting
December 4, 2020
I read “LinkedIn’s Alternate Universe.” I was poking around in an effort to find out how many social profiles are held by Microsoft. The write up provides a number 722 million. However, for my purposes I used a less robust estimate of 660 million. I ran out of space for decimal places. Check the story on Monday, and you will understand my space challenge. The story is Disinterest in Search and Retrieval Quantified.
I recommend this Divinations’ write up because it is amusing, and it helped me understand why the service has become some what peculiar in a social network world in which Ripley’s Believe It or Not! content has become normative.
Here are three examples:
- Posts by living people announcing that the author is dead. Ho, ho. Alive, not dead for the denizens of a personnel department site.
- Begging for dollars and attention. The two seem to be joined at the medulla for some LinkedIn members.
- The antics of recruiters become Twitter jokes.
What is fascinating is that we have a WordPress plug in that posts headlines to LinkedIn automatically. This creates some interesting reactions. First, the software bot has about 800 LinkedIn friends. Okay. I think that’s good. Second, the stories about the MSFT social network service have been filtered as I recall.
The article is worth a gander.
Stephen E Arnold, December 4, 2020
Some US Big Tech Outfits Say Laisse Tomber
December 2, 2020
The trusted “real news” outfit Thomson Reuters published “Amazon, Apple Stay Away from New French Initiative to Set Principles for Big Tech.” Quelle surprise! The “principle” is the silly notion of getting big US technology companies to pay their taxes, fair taxes. Incroyable? Companies not getting with the program allegedly include Apple, Facebook, Google, and Microsoft. These four firms are likely to perceive the suggestion of fairness as a demonstration of flawed logic. It is possible that the initiative may become a cause célèbre because money. France is a mere country anyway.
Stephen E Arnold, December 2, 2020
Microsoft Bing Edge Shopping Reinvented. What?
November 24, 2020
I read “Reinventing Online Shopping on Microsoft Edge.” I like the word “reinventing.” It implies that online shopping is not using Amazon.com. Much to Google’s chagrin, the Bezos bulldozer has become the number one destination for those in the lower 48 who are looking for products. Six out of 10 shopping “journeys” begin online, according to Sleeknote. The same outfit reports that nearly half of US online commerce sales end up at Amazon. An outfit called Moz reports:
With 54 percent of product searches now taking place on Amazon, it’s time to take it seriously as the world’s largest search engine for e-commerce. In fact, if we exclude YouTube as part of Google, Amazon is technically the second largest search engine in the world.
So what about shopping on Microsoft Edge?
I ran this query on Microsoft Edge for AMZ 5700 video card. Here’s what I saw on November 22, 2020:
I ran the same query on Firefox. Here’s what I saw:
Both are different. The write up about reinventing shopping asserts that there are true blue, accidental, and incidental shoppers. That’s MBA think in action. The write up continues:
we [Microsoft] came up with a native-to-browser design framework that tailors shopping assistance to prioritize different information depending on the shopper’s stage in their journey. We determine what stage a person is at based on what kind of page they’re on.
Microsoft points out:
As you design your experiences, think about relying on a consistent UI paradigm that is both familiar and always available to the user. In our case, the UI framework leverages the URL bar, or address bar, in Edge as a quick one-touch anchor for shopping assistance. The URL bar is where people expect things relevant to the current webpage to show up — and we are extending the same model to surface optimized shopping insights. [Emphasis added]
I want to point out:
- I see two different user interfaces: One looks like a Google jumble and the other looks like eBay
- I don’t look for shopping information in the url bar. The url bar is where I want to see — wait for it, please — the url
- Neither interface benefits from little pictures. I am searching for a specific thing and I want a link to a relevant page, not a jazzed up “report.”
Amazon’s shopping is certainly not perfect, but I don’t have to figure out why the display looks different in different browsers or what’s is available.
MBA alert: Amazon and Google have much more traffic than Bing when it comes to shopping. You can check your traffic data for verification, not look in the url bar for an experience. This reality check will verify that blue is the sadness of shopping data analysis, the accidental weirdness Microsoft result pages present to a human shopper, and the incidental effort varying graphical interfaces display.
Stephen E Arnold, November 23, 2020
Clarity: A Better Name Than Pluton. Pluton?
November 20, 2020
After two years, Clarity has finally made it out of Beta, we learn from “Microsoft Clarity Debuts as Free Analytics Tool with Heat Maps” at Search & Performance Marketing Daily. The free tool uses heat maps to analyze the behavior of visitors to one’s website. Reporter Laurie Sullivan writes:
“Clarity — designed to have a low impact on page-load times and there are no caps on traffic no matter what the number of visitors to the website — helps give marketers a deeper understanding of why at website performs one way and not another. It also provides anonymized heat maps and data that show where site visitors clicked and scrolled, and enables marketers to analyze use behavior on the website exactly as it happened through a job description code. Some of the data includes the name of the browser, and whether they are using a PC, tablet or mobile phone to access the site. Heat maps provide a visual way to examine large numbers of site visitor interactions. Microsoft built two types: click maps and scroll maps. While the heat maps tell marketers which pages get the most clicks, the click maps tell marketers what website page content visitors interact with the most. Areas in the map marked in red have the highest frequency of clicks and are usually centered on focal points.”
The heat maps let marketers know whether visitors are clicking where they want them to. It also reports certain behaviors—excessive scrolling, dead clicks, and rage clicks. The last term describes users clicking several times on a spot they believe should be a hyperlink but is not—one would want to either fix an intended link or tweak the graphics on those spots. The tool also supplies a dashboard that presents metrics of the overall traffic patterns, time spent on the site, and even concurrent JavaScript errors. Microsoft pledges Clarity complies with the EU’s General Data Protection Regulation.
But Pluton, Microsoft’s mystery processor? Pluton?
Cynthia Murrell, November 20, 2020
Microsoft Security: Time for a Rethink
November 1, 2020
Not long ago, the Wall Street Journal ran this full page ad for a cyber security company named Intrusion:
The ad is interesting because it highlights the failure of cyber security. Evidence of this ineffective defense is revealed in reports from the FBI, Interpol, and independent researchers: Cyber crime, particularly phishing and ransomware, are increasing. There are hundreds of threat neutralizers, smart cyber shields, and a mind boggling array of AI, machine learning, and predictive methods which are not particularly effective.
“Microsoft 365 Administrators Fail to Implement Basic Security Like MFA” provides some interesting information about the state of security for a widely used software system developed by Microsoft.
The article reveals that researchers have found that 99 percent of breaches can be “prevented using MFA.” MFA is cyber lingo for multi-factor authentication. A common way to prove that a log on is valid is to use a password. But before the password lets the user into the system, a one time code is sent to a mobile phone. The user enters the code from the phone and the system lets the person access the system. Sounds foolproof.
The write up states:
The survey research shows that approximately 78% of Microsoft 365 administrators do not have multi-factor authentication (MFA) activated.
Another finding is that:
Microsoft 365 administrators are given excessive control, leading to increased access to sensitive information. 57% of global organizations have Microsoft 365 administrators with excess permissions to access, modify, or share critical data. In addition, 36% of Microsoft 365 administrators are global admins, meaning these administrators can essentially do whatever they want in Microsoft 365. CIS O365 security guidelines suggests limiting the number of global admins to two-four operators maximum per business.
Let’s step back. If the information in the write up is correct, a major security issue is associated with Microsoft’s software. With an increase in breaches, is it time to ask:
Should Microsoft engage in a rethink of its security methods?
We know that third party vendors are not able to stem the tide of cyber crime. A security company would not buy a full page ad in the Wall Street Journal to call attention to failure if it were just marketing fluff. We know that Microsoft admins and Microsoft apps are vulnerable.
Perhaps shifting the burden from the software and cloud vendor to the user is not the optimal approach when one seeks to make security more effective and efficient. The shift is probably more economical for Microsoft; that is, let the customer carry the burden.
Some Microsoft customers may push back and say, “Wrong.” Perhaps regulators will show more interest in security if their newfound energy for taking action against monopolies does not wane? Over to the JEDI knights.
Stephen E Arnold, November 1, 2020
-
- Subscribe to Beyond Search
Feature archive
News archive
-
