Bloomberg Continues to Needle Palantir Technologies
February 1, 2019
Buzzfeed once was a good source of anti-Palantir Technologiesβ information. But change is constant. Now Bloomberg finds news in the company that tries to keep a low profile.
Palantir Technologies, as you may know, is a firm which is a search and retrieval system on steroids. One can use the system to find an entity amidst the process content. If search doesnβt work, the firm has bundled a range of software modules to identify those elusive facts an investigator, a financial analyst, or a drug researcher seeks.
Bloombergβs βPalantir Slashes Its Own Stock Price to Boost Moraleβ reports that employees are a bit unhappy. The company is 15 years old, and not really a start up. The firmβs technology is a bit long in the tooth as well. Big systems are difficult to reengineer to keep up with the waves of newcomers. For example, I am not sure a comprehensive list of Palantir-like start ups in Israel exists. I have lists, but these are far from complete. Ever hear of Narrative Science?
The write up points out that Palantirβs high valuation has begun to slump, like the eyesight of a teen who has played video games for a decade every night for five hours in his or her bedroom.
The main point of the write up strikes at the soul of the Silicon Valley capitalist: βThe stock adjustment raises an important question: What is Palantir worth?β
The answer is that search centric companies, regardless of how they are packaged, lack the ability to generate cash in the manner of Facebook, Google, or, praise the Austrian economists, Amazon.
This Bloomberg statement casts a shadow over Palantir and its management team:
Because Palantir typically offers lower salaries than many nearby tech companies, equity is a big part of the sell. But the stock options were overpriced, according to Palantir shareholders and prospective investors. All seven mutual funds that own Palantir shares have slashed the value of their holdings since their 2015 high of $11.38. SP Investments Management values Palantir at $7.87 a share as of September, the most recent data available. Morgan Stanleyβs mutual funds have decreased prices seven times in three years, to $2.49.
Employee unrest, poaching of staff, and financial fancy dancing are routine in Silicon Valley. Why target Palantir? Thatβs a question which I find more interesting than why the company is trying to keep employees happy?
The answer, “Real news.”
Stephen E Arnold, February 1, 2019
Palantir Technologies: Keeping Momentum, Job One
November 29, 2018
Hop in your time machine and think back about five years. While it feels like the olden days of horse-drawn carriages already, it was a golden age for big data analytics startups. Tops on that list for many was Palantir. Thought, today things are much different, as we discovered in a recent Cheddar video, βWhy Palantirβs Valuation is Withering Away.β
According to the article:
βNot long ago Palantir Technologies was valued at $20 billion and one of Silicon Valleyβs brightest tech companies. Today, the big data analytics companyβs worth has been slashed to $6 billion by Morgan Stanley as it heads towards an IPO.β
Perhaps part of the lag draws from Palantirβs secrecy, considering it works for organizations like the CIA and others.
However, stakeholders and employees still have big dreams like many other Silicon Valley shop: They want to go public.
A drop in valuation and concern over whether they can ever turn a profit is starting to seriously tarnish this once golden child of the tech industry.
Beyond Search does not want to draw parallels with Autonomy or other search centric firms. Some of these outfits found that the momentum of selling sizzle was difficult to maintain in a room with open windows.
Worth watching how this financial drama plays out as Amazon gears up to become the go to provider of policeware and possibly business intelligence services.
Patrick Roland, November 29, 2018
Thomson Reuters on a Privacy International Beat
November 26, 2018
I know that commercial database publishers can be profitable operations. But in order to keep pace with erosion of some traditional revenue streams, some professional publishers have been working to generate new databases which can be licensed to certain government agencies. In most cases, a researcher or librarian will not have these electronic files in their toolkit.
Privacy International published βWho Supplies the Data, Analysis, and Tech Infrastructure to US Immigration Authorities?β The report is available without charge, but I suggest that you download it promptly. Certain reports about some topics can go offline without notice.
I donβt want to dig through the references to references to Palantir. The information about that company is not particularly fresh. However, Privacy International has gathered some useful examples of Thomson Reutersβ products and services to law enforcement and other government agencies.
Privacy International seems unaware that many LE and intel entities routinely outsource work to third part, license a wide range of numeric and factual data, and tap into the talent pools at third party firms.
The Privacy International report does not provide much information about Thomson Reutersβ use of the Palantir technology. That might be an interesting topic for some young researcher to explore. We will do a short item about some of the Privacy International information in the DarkCyber for December 11, 2018.
Stephen E Arnold, November 26, 2018
Facebook: Collateral Damage?
May 17, 2018
The Cambridge Analytica/Facebook data scandal has rightly been scrutinized by everyone from individual users to entire government bodies. As could be expected when the players are this large, what people are finding links together unlikely suspects and victims in this data breach. One such surprise popped up this week when we read a Gizmodo report, βFacebook βLooking Intoβ Palantirβs Access to User Data.β
According to the story:
βThe inquiry was led by Damian Collins, chair of Parliamentβs Digital, Culture, Media, and Sport Committee. According to CNBC, Collins asked if Palantir was part of Facebookβs βreview work.β
βWhile itβs unclear if it gained access to the Facebook user data that Cambridge Analytica harvested, Palantirβs connection to the social network extends beyond any potential collaboration with Cambridge Analytica. Peter Thiel, a Facebook board member, is a Palantir co-founder.β
We arenβt sure what the big data powerhouse Palantir knew or didnβt know, but if they are found to have violated laws it could get ugly. And the ugliness doesnβt seem to know any depths in this case. Take for example, the recent news that Cambridge Analyticaβs data could be up for sale since the company declared bankruptcy after the data breach news tanked the company. Buckle up, because we donβt think the dominoes are done falling yet.
Patrick Roland, May 17, 2018
Palantir: Cambridge Analytica Secondary Shock Wave
April 19, 2018
Data analysis firm Palantir has come under scrutiny after it was learned that one of its employees contributed to Cambridge Analyticaβs acquisition of private data back in 2013 and 2014. Now BuzzFeed News emphasizes, βPalantir Had No Policy on Social Media Data Collection Prior to 2015.β The company was used to working with internal data for organizations like the FBI and JPMorgan Chase, to name just a couple big-name examples, where the data is clearly their clientsβ property. When Palantir began working with social-media data, it seems they failed to anticipate the need for a comprehensive policy. Reporter William Alden writes:
βPalantir insiders felt that the company’s βad hocβ approach to handling social media data for customers in general was βbecoming unworkable,β a senior engineer said in an October 2014 memo not related to Cambridge Analytica. Palantir took steps to develop a social media data policy in early 2015, soliciting input from employees who’d worked on customer accounts involving the use of such data, an email from that time shows. Palantir has said previously that its employee, Alfredas Chmieliauskas, advised the Cambridge Analytica team in βan entirely personal capacityβ from 2013 to 2014, and that Cambridge Analytica was never a Palantir customer. There is no indication in the documents seen by BuzzFeed News that the push by Palantir to develop the social media policy had anything to do with Cambridge Analytica. Rather, the push was tied to requests by Palantir’s customers to mine social data during a time when Facebookβs restrictions on accessing and gathering data were much looser.β
The article reveals a few more details about Palantirβs internal discussion, and reminds us that the prevailing attitude toward social-media data was much more relaxed then than it is today. We trust that the company has tightened up their policy since. Founded in 2004, Palantir is based in Palo Alto, California, and has offices around the world.
This alleged interaction may cause a gentle breeze or a cyclone. Stay tuned.
Cynthia Murrell, April 19, 2018
Crime Prediction: Not a New Intelligence Analysis Function
March 16, 2018
We noted βNew Orleans Ends Its Palantir Predictive Policing Program.β The interest in this Palantir Technologiesβ project surprised us from our log cabin with a view of the mine drainage run off pond. The predictive angle is neither new nor particularly stealthy. Many years ago when I worked for one of the outfits developing intelligence analysis systems, the βpredictiveβ function was a routine function.
Hereβs how it works:
- Identify an entity of interest (person, event, organization, etc.)
- Search for other items including the entity
- Generate near matches. (We called this βfuzzificationβ because we wanted hits which were βnearβ the entity in which we had an interest. Plus, the process worked reasonably well in reverse too.)
- Punch the analyze function.
Once one repeats the process several times, the system dutifully generates reports which make it easy to spot:
- Exact matches; for example, a βnameβ has a telephone number and a dossier
- Close matches; for example, a partial name or organization is associated with the telephone number of the identity
- Predicted matches; for example, based on available βknownsβ, the system can generate a list of highly likely matches.
The particular systems with which I am familiar allow the analyst, investigator, or intelligence professional to explore the relationships among these pieces of information. Timeline functions make it trivial to plot when events took place and retrieve from the analytics module highly likely locations for future actions. If an βorganizationβ held a meeting with several βentitiesβ at a particular location, the geographic component can plot the actual meetings and highlight suggestions for future meetings. In short, prediction functions work in a manner similar to Excelβs filling in items in a number series.
What would you predict as a βhot spotβ based on this map? The red areas, the yellow areas, the orange areas, or the areas without an overlay? Prediction is facilitated with some outputs from intelligence analysis software. (Source: Palantir via Google Image search)
Is Change Coming to High Tech Lobbying in Washington, DC?
March 14, 2018
The received wisdom in Washington, DC is that when it comes to politics, money talks.
The idea is simple: Donate money to a politicianβs campaign or a politicianβs favorite βcauseβ and get your email and phone calls answered.
The Independent explains that, βGoogle Outspends All Rival Washington Lobbyists For First Time In 2017.β
In 2017, Google spent $18 million to lobby Congress on a slew of issues ranging from immigration, tax reform, antitrust, and online advertising. Tech companies have big bucks and the power to take on Congress on governmental policies. Lawmakers, on the other hand, fire back with pot shots like allowing Russian operatives to share content and how their software and other technology allows tech companies to abuse their power.
Googleβs Washington operation proposed legislation that would require Web companies to collaborate on a public database of political as that run on their platforms. The idea is that the database would prevent foreign nations from exploiting online platforms. Other companies like Amazon and Facebook have ramped up their lobbying spending too.
Despite the power tech companies wield, their roles in society are changing and there is some fear associated with it:
ββThese are companies that are touching so many parts of the economy, they are touching so many parts of our geography. So it’s inevitable that they are going to engage in a host of political and policy issues,β said Julie Samuels, the executive director of Tech: NYC, a group that represents New York-based tech firms. Samuels added that Silicon Valley has also had to adjust to a new political order, under a Republican administration. βMany tech companies had only been real players during the Obama administration. They had a lot to learn.ββ
Now the received wisdom may have to modified. Beyond Search noted that Palantir has landed a chunk of a US government contract to create a DCGS which meets the needs of the US Army.
We think that Google will continue to support lobbying, but it will seek more deals like its tie up with the US governmentβs push for artificial intelligence. What may emerge is a new approach to influencing procurement decisions and legislation in Washington.
Whitney Grace, March 14, 2018
Short Honk: Palantir Technologies and DCGS
March 10, 2018
I donβt know if the information in βArmy Taps Raytheon, Palantir for Potential $876M Ground Intell system Support Contract.β The Beyond Search and Dark Cyber teams will monitor the subject. The GovConWire stated on March 9, 2018:
Raytheon and Palantir Technologies have won spots on a potential 10-year, $876 million contract to help the U.S. Army address technology requirements for the service branchβs Distributed Common Ground System.
If on the money, this is big news. Our perception was that Palantir was not in the DCGS winnerβs circle. Looks like IBM and its technology partners have to adapt.
Stephen E Arnold, March 10, 2018
Palantir: Accused of Hegelian Contradictions
January 29, 2018
I bet you have not thought about Hegel since you took that required philosophy course in college. Well, Hegel and his βcontradictionsβ are central to βWEF 2018: Davos, Data, Palantir and the Future of the Internet.β
I highlighted this passage from the essay:
Data is the route to security. Data is the route to oppression. Data is the route to individual ideation. Data is the route to the hive mind. Data is the route to civic wealth. Data is the route to civic collapse.
Thesis, antitheses, synthesis in action I surmise.
The near term objective is synthesis. I assume this is the βconnecting the dotsβ approach to finding what one needs to know.
I learned:
The stakes for big data couldnβt be bigger.
Okay, a categorical in our fast changing, diverse economic and political climate. Be afraid seems to be the message.
Palantirβs point of operations in Davos is described in the write up as βa pimped up liquor store.β Helpful and highly suggestive too.
The conclusion of the essay warranted a big red circle:
So next time you hear the names Palantir or Alex Karp, stop what youβre doing and pay attention. The future β your future β is under discussion. Under construction. This little first draft of history of which youβve made it to the end (congratulations and thanks) β the history of data β is of a future that will in time come to be seen for what it is: digital that truly matters.
Several observations:
- The author wants me to believe that Palantir is not a pal.
- The big data thing troubles the author because Palantir is one of the vendors providing next generation information access.
- The goal of making Palantir into something unique is best accomplished by invoking Fancy Dan ideas.
I would suggest that knowledge about companies like Gamma Group FinFisher, Shoghi, Trovicor, and some other interesting non US entities might put Palantir in perspective. Palantir has an operational focus; some of the other vendors perform different information services.
Palantir is an innovator, but it is part of a landscape of data intercept and analysis organizations. I could make a case that Palantir is capable but some companies in Europe and the East are actually more technologically advanced.
But these outfits were not at Davos. Why? Thatβs a good question. Perhaps they were too busy with their commercial and government work. My hunch is that a few of these outfits were indeed βthereβ, just not noticed by the expert who checked out the liquor store.
Stephen E Arnold, January 29, 2019
Palantir and Google: Surprising Allegation from St Louis
November 16, 2017
I read βThiel Gave Money to Missouri Attorney General Going after Google.β The article reports:
Peter Thiel, the venture capitalist who backed Donald Trump’s presidential run, gave $300,000 to a political campaign of Josh Hawley, the Missouri attorney general who opened an antitrust investigation into Google this week.
My reaction was, βIs there a connection between this donation and the investigation of Google by Josh Hawley, the Missouri attorney general?β
The article appears to make this connection. I am not so quick to seize upon this implication. From my point of view, without more factual information, the story leaves me as cold as a catfish pulled from the Crooked River.
Stephen E Arnold, November 16, 2017