The Government Printing Office Plays the Name Game
May 8, 2014
According to The Washington Post Article, “Does The 153-Year-Old Government Printing Office Need A Digital-Era Name?” there is a bipartisan bill in the Senate to change the office’s work to better explain its digital age work. Senators Saxby Chambliss and Amy Klobuchar sponsor the bill. It would change the name “printing” to “publishing” and the two titles for the Government Printing Office’s (GPO) head officials would no longer be “public printer” and “deputy public printer,” but “director” and “deputy director.”
“Supporters of the measure say the current GPO name ignores the agency’s past and present efforts to reinvent itself for modern times with digital offerings such as e-books, apps and the Federal Digital System, which allows the public to search for, browse and download official publications from all branches of the government.”
The bill moved to the full Senate on April 10. The federal government funds only 16 percent of the GPO’s budget. The rest of its income is generated by digital and print sales of its products. The name change would better explain how the GPO has advanced availability of its records as well as endeavors to expand itself further. Go for the name change, GPO! The good thing is that the GPO wouldn’t need to change its initials.
Whitney Grace, May 08, 2014
Sponsored by ArnoldIT.com, developer of Augmentext
Comments
2 Responses to “The Government Printing Office Plays the Name Game”
Excellent beat ! I wish to apprentice while you amend your
site, how could i subscribe for a blog site? The account aided me a acceptable deal.
I had been a little bit acquainted of this your broadcast provided
bright clear idea
Feel free to visit my web-site :: he has a good point; Thanh,
hi!,I really like your writing very so much! share we be in contact extra about your article on AOL? I require an expert in this house to unravel my problem. Maybe that’s you! Taking a look ahead to look you.