Which Is the Winner: Google Speech or Amazon Transcribe?
October 22, 2018
The answer appears in a write up called “Google Speech Vs Amazon Transcribe: The War Of Speech Technology.” Spoiler: It looks like Google stomps Amazon in this remarkable analysis.
When it comes to languages supported, Google is king; 119 to Amazon’s paltry dozen or so.
Which system does better with long talking, it is a tie. Two hours is the audio limit. But the write up does not explain if the two hours are chunked or if multiple two hour blocks can be strung together. Important information excluded or ignored in this head to head analysis.
Programming languages? Looks like a toss up. But Amazon supports Dot Net, which may be important at clients like the US Department of Defense.
Privacy? Yeah, well, not much information. The write up ignores Amazon’s federation capabilities and its cross correlation analytics. And Google? Yeah, advertising. We know what that means.
Audio formats? Google seems to cover the bases. The write up ignores the Amazon APIs, which is not surprising because none of Amazon’s law enforcement and policeware capabilities seem to have hit the author’s radar.
Vocabulary? Well, if Google supports more languages, whatever vocabulary tweaking it permits will crush Amazon’s capabilities.
Additional features? Google can do emotions. Right, Alexa cannot it seems. The Beyond Search goose thinks the author should check into Alexa’s capabilities with regard to Amazon Sagemaker. Just a thought: You, gentle reader, may want to check this out as well.
Wrap up?
Both are equal. But the way the write up presents information, Google is the implicit winner.
The Beyond Search goose happens to disagree. What are those Alexa enabled gizmos doing? Interesting question which this Analytics India article does not address.
Stephen E Arnold, October 22, 2018
Comments
-
- Subscribe to Beyond Search
Feature archive
News archive
-
