Alphabet Google: Alleged Election Manipulation Goal
August 5, 2019
In the best tradition of 2019 news reporting, an opinion has become “real news.” I read “Google Wants Trump to Lose in 2020: Former Engineer for Tech Giant Says: That’s Their Agenda.” DarkCyber prefers watching Twitch’s live stream of the Hong Kong protests to the “experts” who appear on Fox News.
However, Fox issued an actual “real news” story with old school words. The write up reports the actual non real fake words of Kevin Cernekee, a former Google engineer, who allegedly departed Google in 2018. The reason? Rumors about misuse of equipment was one possible reason, which strikes DarkCyber as unsubstantiated.
We noted this statement in the write up:
“They have very biased people running every level of the company,” Cernekee continued. “They have quite a bit of control over the political process. That’s something we should really worry about.”
The “they” appears to refer to individuals who work at Alphabet Google, although the floating in space pronouns create some ambiguity.
Here’s another sound bite, but in text on Web site form:
“They really want Trump to lose in 2020. That’s their agenda. They have very biased people running every level of the company.”
If you want more, please, navigate to the “real news” story.
A few observations:
- A single source, particularly a person who no longer works at Google and who may have an interesting historical interaction with the firm, may or may not be delivering actual factual information. A second or third source would be helpful.
- The likelihood of a Google conspiracy to alter an election exists, of course. But Google relies on smart software. The allegations in the write up suggest that actual factual humanoids interact with the smart software to fiddle search results. DarkCyber thinks some data, sample searches, and supporting testimony would be useful. Sure, the other sources might be biased, but more than one voice plus some data would be helpful.
- Why is this former Google engineer now actualized? Is it a book deal? A desire for revenge? A way to get hired by a company who wants someone with a sharp edge to write code? Context and motive would be interesting to DarkCyber.
To sum up: Without more than one person’s headline making statement, DarkCyber asks, “Is Google sufficiently organized to fiddle search results in a consistent sustained manner over time?”
Example: Google killed its Hangouts service and just added a new feature to the marginalized service.
Example: Google continues to push the amusing Loon balloon as more adventurous innovators are moving to satellites.
DarkCyber asks, “Is Google capable of a manipulation on this scale?”
We need more than one de-hired Xoogler’s statements.
Stephen E Arnold, August 5, 2019
Comments
-
- Subscribe to Beyond Search
Feature archive
News archive
-
