So Lets Talk About MBAs Understanding Analytic Methods
July 27, 2012
Apparently biologists and scientists are having communication issues, but fortunately they have a medium to provide some council. Repercussions can be limited, as according to PNAS’s article “Heavy use of Equations Impedes Communication Among Biologists,” scientists just need to work on relevance and presentation in order to improve communication and move forward.
The method to the MBA’s madness still seems a little mad, as:
“Most research in biology is empirical, yet empirical studies rely fundamentally on theoretical work for generating testable predictions and interpreting observations. Despite this interdependence, many empirical studies build largely on other empirical studies with little direct reference to relevant theory, suggesting a failure of communication that may hinder scientific progress.”
Their actual point was too many mathematical equations are having a negative effect on the inputting of citations per page. It seems the more equations equal less citations. The irony is that the language of science is often one of mathematics.
Communication is the key to progress, and obviously scientists are not locked out since they are still progressing. The MBA’s think they need to enhance the presentation of the mathematical models utilized. This makes sense, but science is based on research and theory, so eventually the professionals will draw their on conclusion.
So, let us talk about MBA’s understanding of analytic methods. Is their conclusion feasible, or will it only lead to more miscommunication?
Jennifer Shockley, July 27, 2012
Comments
-
- Subscribe to Beyond Search
Feature archive
News archive
-
