Open Source Myths and Truths
May 1, 2013
There have been many headlines swirling lately regarding the security considerations of open source software, particularly for the enterprise. Some tout that open source is far more secure, others that it is far less so. However, the truth is bubbling to the surface, in terms of security, open source fares no worse or better. ZDNet gives attention to the issue in their article, “Six Open Source Security Myths Debunked – and Eight Real Challenges to Consider.”
The article begins:
“Detractors of open source software often point to its broad developer base and open source code as a potential security risk. But that’s not a fair assessment, according to Dr Ian Levy, technical director with the CESG, a department of the UK’s GCHQ intelligence agency that advises UK government on IT security. Open source is no worse or better than proprietary software when it comes to security, according to Levy, at the Open Source, Open Standards conference in London last week.”
So what does make the difference in open source? The quality of the solution makes the difference, particularly if you are investing in a value-added open source solution. An industry vetted option like LucidWorks ensures that security and efficiency are both maintained. Their strategic partners and alliances ensures that the technology is fully customizable, scalable, and always on the cutting edge.
Emily Rae Aldridge, May 1, 2013
Sponsored by ArnoldIT.com, developer of Beyond Search
Comments
-
- Subscribe to Beyond Search
Feature archive
News archive
-
