Infodemic: Another Facet of Good Old 2020

November 12, 2020

It is difficult to locate non political, non Covid, and non frightening information. I read “Misinformation in the New Normal in a technology publication.” The essay is descriptive; that is, one does not solve a problem or spell out a fix. It’s like a florid passage in James Fennimore Cooper’s novels. There were some factoids in the essay; for example:

According to one piece of research, websites spreading misinformation about the pandemic received nearly half a billion views via Facebook in April alone…

Source? Not stated.

I also noted this statement in the write up:

As defensive measures evolve, so do the attacks, and the further development of deep fake technology is a worrying growth area for misinformation campaigns. Like fake domains, these altered recordings aim to create a veneer of trust in order to seed bad or dangerous information – but deep fakes are now around five years ahead, in technological development terms, of our ability to defend against them.

Five years? That’s another interesting number: 2025. And the lingo like infodemic? Snappy.

I have added the word “infodemic” to my list of interesting neologisms which contain gems like these: neurosymbolic AI, perception hacks, digital detox, and dissonance score.

But the article “Can the Law Stop Internet Bots from Undressing You?” raises another viewpoint about online data; specifically:

For women and men over the age of 18, the production of a sexual pseudo-image of a person is not in itself illegal under international law or in the UK, even if it is produced and distributed without the consent of the person portrayed in the image.

Have government regulators failed? Have educators been unable to impart ethical values to students? Have clever people embraced the methods of some Silicon Valley-type wizards?

Problem solved in 2025?

Stephen E Arnold, November 12, 2020


Comments are closed.

  • Archives

  • Recent Posts

  • Meta